Co-trimoxazole versus nafcillin in the therapy of experimental meningitis due to Staphylococcus aureus
Abstract:
Co-trimoxazole was compared with nafcillin against Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and in the therapy of experimental Staph. aureus meningitis in rabbits. Co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim:sulphamethoxazole in a 1:20 ratio) was synergistic against 22/24 strains of Staph. aureus in vitro. The MBC90 of co-trimoxazole and nafcillin were 0.156-3.12 mg/l and 0.25 mg/l, respectively, concentrations below those achievable in purulent cerebrospinal fluid. The rate of bacterial killing (Staph. aureus) by co-trimoxazole and nafcillin were similar in both broth and pooled CSF in vitro. However, the MBC increased and the rate of bactericidal activity of both agents declined when tested in CSF at a higher inoculum (10(7) cfu/ml). During continuous intravenous infusion therapy of a reproducible, uniformly fatal (if untreated) model of experimental Staph. aureus meningitis, serum concentrations of all agents closely approximated those found in humans receiving standard parenteral regimens. The mean percent penetration into CSF ([CSF]/[serum] X 100) was 2.9, 35.6 and 27.1% for nafcillin, trimethoprim and sulphamethoxazole, respectively. Although both nafcillin and co-trimoxazole therapy reduced CSF Staph. aureus concentrations significantly more rapidly (P less than 0.001) when compared to untreated controls, the bactericidal rate was modest. The CSF was rendered sterile in 0/64 animals treated with either regimen for 8 h. Nafcillin was more rapidly bactericidal in vivo (P less than 0.03) than co-trimoxazole in this model. Caution is advised in the use of co-trimoxazole for infections of the central nervous system caused by Staph. aureus.
Insights
Co-trimoxazole showed synergy against Staphylococcus aureus in vitro, but both it and nafcillin had modest bactericidal rates in experimental meningitis. Nafcillin was more rapidly bactericidal in vivo, suggesting caution with co-trimoxazole for central nervous system infections.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
- Microbiology
Background:
- Staphylococcus aureus is a significant pathogen causing central nervous system infections.
- Effective treatment of Staph. aureus meningitis requires antibiotics with good cerebrospinal fluid penetration and bactericidal activity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of co-trimoxazole and nafcillin against Staphylococcus aureus in an experimental meningitis model.
- To evaluate the cerebrospinal fluid penetration and bactericidal rates of both antibiotics.
Main Methods:
- In vitro susceptibility testing (MBC90) and bacterial killing assays in broth and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
- In vivo study using a rabbit model of experimental Staph. aureus meningitis treated with continuous intravenous infusion.
- Measurement of serum and CSF antibiotic concentrations and bacterial load reduction.
Main Results:
- Co-trimoxazole exhibited in vitro synergy against most Staph. aureus strains.
- Both antibiotics showed similar in vitro killing rates, but efficacy decreased at higher CSF inoculums.
- In vivo, both agents reduced bacterial load but did not sterilize CSF within 8 hours.
- Nafcillin demonstrated more rapid in vivo bactericidal activity than co-trimoxazole.
Conclusions:
- While co-trimoxazole has in vitro activity, its in vivo bactericidal rate in experimental Staph. aureus meningitis is modest.
- Nafcillin appears more effective in vivo for this specific model.
- Caution is recommended when using co-trimoxazole for Staph. aureus central nervous system infections.
More Related Videos
11:15Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations
Published on: July 24, 2021
07:32Evaluating the Immune Response of a Nanoemulsion Adjuvant Vaccine Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infection
Published on: September 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology
