Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025

Histological Quantification of Chronic Myocardial Infarct in Rats
Published on: December 11, 2016
Reassessment of Vegetation Size as a Sole Indication for Surgery in Left-Sided Infective Endocarditis
Gonzalo Cabezón1, Javier López1, Isidre Vilacosta2
1Instituto de Ciencias del Corazón, Hospital Clínico, Ciber de enfermedades cardiovasculares, Valladolid, Spain.
Insights
Surgery for large vegetations in left-sided infective endocarditis (LSIE) is not always beneficial. Large vegetations alone do not warrant surgery if other poor outcome predictors are absent.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Current guidelines suggest surgery for left-sided infective endocarditis (LSIE) with large vegetations.
- The necessity of surgery based solely on large vegetation size, without other adverse factors, remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of vegetation size on mortality in LSIE.
- To determine if surgery improves outcomes in LSIE patients with large vegetations but no other indicators of poor prognosis.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 726 patients with definitive LSIE.
- Multivariate analysis to identify mortality predictors.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients with large (>10 mm) versus small (≤10 mm) vegetations.
- Assessment of surgical impact on mortality in a subgroup without heart failure or uncontrolled infection.
Main Results:
- Large vegetations were associated with increased mortality (31.7% vs 24.8%).
- Factors predicting death included age, Staphylococcus aureus, perivalvular complications, heart failure, kidney failure, and septic shock; vegetation size was not an independent predictor.
- In patients with large vegetations but no heart failure or uncontrolled infection, mortality rates were similar with or without surgery (18.6% vs 11.6%).
Conclusions:
- While large vegetations indicate a poorer prognosis in LSIE, they alone are not a sufficient indication for surgery.
- Surgery does not appear to improve outcomes for patients with large vegetations if they lack other significant predictors of poor prognosis.
- These findings question the routine recommendation of surgery based solely on vegetation size in LSIE.
Background:
Guidelines recommend surgery for left-sided infective endocarditis (LSIE) that is associated with large vegetations. Given that most patients who undergo surgery also have other indications (heart failure and/or uncontrolled infection), it is not settled whether surgery should be routinely recommended in patients with large vegetations but no other predictors of poor outcome.
Methods:
A total of 726 patients with definitive LSIE were included in our analysis. The mean age was 64.9 years, and 61% were male. Multivariate analysis of all patients was performed to determine whether vegetation size is related to death in LSIE. Then patients were divided into two groups according to vegetation size: group A (>10 mm, n = 420) and group B (≤10 mm, n = 306). Univariate and multivariate analyses of group A patients were carried out to identify the variables related to death in this group. The impact of surgery on mortality in group A patients without heart failure or uncontrolled local infection (n = 139) was assessed.
Results:
Age, Staphylococcus aureus, perivalvular complications, heart failure, kidney failure, and septic shock, but not vegetation size, were associated with death. Patients with large vegetations showed increased mortality (31.7% in group A vs 24.8% in group B; P = .045). Group A had more valve rupture and valve regurgitation than group B, but heart failure (55% vs 53%; P = .678), stroke (22% vs 17.0%, P = .091), systemic embolism (39% vs 32%; P = .074), perivalvular complication (28% vs 28%; P = .865), and septic shock (15% vs 13%; P = .288) were similar in both groups. In patients from group A without heart failure or uncontrolled infection, mortality was similar with and without surgery (n = 139; n = 70 with surgery and n = 69 without surgery; mortality, 18.6% vs 11.6%, respectively; P = .251).
Conclusions:
Large vegetations identify patients with poor outcomes in the context of LSIE. However, surgery is not associated with a better prognosis in patients with large vegetations if they do not present with another predictor of poor outcome such as heart failure or uncontrolled infection. These findings challenge whether vegetation size alone should be an indication for surgery in LSIE.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

