Radiation Therapy Without Anesthesia for a 2-Year-Old Child Using Audio-Visual Assisted Therapeutic Ambience in...

Radiation therapy (RT) is essential to managing many pediatric malignancies but can provoke anxiety, fear, and discomfort for children owing to prolonged treatment time, extended course, and restrictive immobilization. Patients younger than 10 years frequently require daily general anesthesia (GA), which is resource intensive, expensive, potentially toxic, and anxiety and fear provoking. Audio-Visual Assisted Therapeutic Ambience in Radiation Therapy (AVATAR), a video streaming device, has been proposed as an alternative to anesthesia in patients aged 3 to 10 years. A pilot study evaluating the efficacy of this novel innovation is accruing, but patients younger than 3 years are ineligible.

We simulated a 2-year-old with stage IV Wilms tumor for bilateral whole-lung and left-flank irradiation without GA. Using AVATAR, we attempted to deliver RT to this patient without sedation. Patient anxiety at the time of simulation and at the beginning, middle, and end of the treatment course was characterized using the validated Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Score (mYPAS) measurement tool.

Although the patient tolerated computed tomography simulation without GA or AVATAR use, his mYPAS of 14 out of 18 indicated significant anxiety. Using AVATAR, all treatments were delivered without GA; his mYPASs were 5 and 4 (the lowest possible) and 4 at the first, midcourse, and final treatments, indicating no significant anxiety and a decrease from the pre-AVATAR baseline. Without GA, the time to deliver RT decreased by 66% from 90 to 30 minutes.

We describe an expanded, previously unreported indication for AVATAR by demonstrating the feasibility of this approach to reduce or omit anesthesia in appropriate younger patients currently excluded from ongoing trials. The financial and quality-of-life benefits (including decreased stress, anxiety, toxic effects, cost, and appointment time) of AVATAR use may be extendable to a younger patient population than previously thought. In older children, prospective validation is ongoing, but additional study in patients younger than 3 years is needed.