Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025
Assessment of Viability of Human Fat Injection into Nude Mice with Micro-Computed Tomography
Published on: January 7, 2015
Oncologic safety of breast reconstruction with autologous fat grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ricardo Tukiama1, René A C Vieira2, Ed C R Moura3
1Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Campus do Bacanga, Avenida dos Portugueses 1966, Prédio do Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, 65080-805, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil; Department of Mastology and Breast Reconstruction, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Viléla, 1331, 14784-400, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Gynaecology, Breast Diseases Division, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Napoleão de Barros, 632, 04024-002, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background:
Autologous fat grating has become increasingly popular as a breast reconstructive procedure. Nevertheless, preclinical studies show that fat transfer to a previous breast cancer site could activate latent cancer cells, creating a favourable environment for disease recurrence. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate whether fat grafting increases the risk of locoregional recurrence in patients formerly treated for breast cancer.
Methods:
Based on PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review searching for randomised clinical trials and matched cohorts on the topic was performed in the electronic databases Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. The date of the last search was July 20, 2021. The meta-analysis assessed the comparison of locoregional recurrence between groups.
Results:
From a total of 558 publications, data from nine matched cohorts (1.6%) reporting on 4247 subjects (1590 and 2657 subjects, respectively, in lipofilling and control groups) were suitable for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Neither of the outcomes had a statistically significant difference for disease recurrence. For the primary outcome, comparing locoregional recurrence rates between groups, the incidence rate ratio was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.68-1.26; P = 0.620).
Conclusion:
The present meta-analysis, which comprises the outcomes of the individual studies with the best current evidence on the topic so far, strengthens the evidence favouring the oncologic safety of lipofilling for breast reconstruction.
More Related Videos
07:58Stromal Vascular Fraction-enriched Fat Grafting for the Treatment of Symptomatic End-neuromata
Published on: November 23, 2017
13:35Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024