Longitudinal Follow-Up With Radiologic Screening for Recurrence and Secondary Hiatal Hernia in Neonates With Open

Katrin B Zahn1,2, Thomas Schaible2,3, Neysan Rafat3

  • 1Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Children's Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

Frontiers in Pediatrics
|January 3, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair complications, including recurrence, depend on surgical technique. Long-term radiologic screening is crucial for early detection and improved outcomes after neonatal CDH repair.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Neonatal Medicine

Background:

  • Recurrence is a severe complication after neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair, with reported rates up to 50% after patch implantation.
  • Previous studies on CDH repair complications are limited by varying surgical techniques, retrospective designs, and lack of standardized follow-up or imaging.
  • Reliable detection of complication rates and identification of risk factors are needed for improved patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reliably detect complication rates using radiologic screening during longitudinal follow-up after neonatal open CDH repair.
  • To identify independent risk factors associated with diaphragmatic complications and recurrence after CDH repair.
  • To propose a risk-stratified approach for managing diaphragmatic complications post-CDH repair.

Main Methods:

  • A 12-year longitudinal follow-up study of consecutive neonates undergoing open CDH repair at a referral center with a standardized treatment algorithm.
  • Radiologic screening at defined intervals was used to monitor for recurrence and diaphragmatic complications.
  • Multivariate analysis was employed to identify independent risk factors for complications.

Main Results:

  • Out of 326 neonates with a minimum 2-year follow-up, 38 (11.6%) experienced recurrence or secondary hiatal hernias.
  • Diaphragmatic complications occurred in 8.6% of patients after discharge, significantly associated with initial defect size.
  • Independent risk factors for complications included left-sided CDH (RR 8.5), abdominal wall patch (RR 3.2), and age ≤4 years (RR 6.5).

Conclusions:

  • The long-term complication rate after CDH repair is highly dependent on surgical technique, with broad cone-shaped patches potentially achieving lower recurrence rates.
  • Longitudinal follow-up with regular radiologic imaging until adolescence is essential for detecting recurrence and preventing severe complications.
  • A risk-stratified approach to diaphragmatic complications, informed by surgical technique and patient factors, is proposed.

Related Concept Videos

Pneumothorax-II01:27

Pneumothorax-II

Pneumothorax is a medical condition defined by the buildup of air in the pleural space between the lungs and the chest wall. This accumulation of air can lead to partial or complete lung collapse, resulting in a range of clinical manifestations. Understanding the clinical presentation and effective management strategies is crucial for healthcare professionals in providing timely and appropriate care to individuals with pneumothorax.
Clinical Manifestations:
441
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management01:26

Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management

Patients with esophageal strictures often experience a range of symptoms. Initially, they may have difficulty swallowing solid foods, which can progress to include liquids. Additional symptoms may involve chest pain or discomfort, regurgitating food and fluids, heartburn, unintentional weight loss, coughing or choking during meals, and hoarseness.
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
184
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:28

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

Esophageal perforations manifest in various clinical forms, influenced by factors such as the perforation's cause and location (cervical, intrathoracic, or intra-abdominal), the extent of contamination, and potential injury to adjacent mediastinal structures. The timing between the perforation occurrence and treatment initiation also affects the clinical presentation.
Clinical Manifestations:
170