Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring Respiration Rate from Speech.

Digital biomarkers·2025
Same author

Review of machine learning solutions for eating disorders.

International journal of medical informatics·2024
Same author

Vitamin C and epigenetics: A short physiological overview.

Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland)·2023
Same author

Tracking of Nutritional Intake Using Artificial Intelligence.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2023
Same author

Generating High-Resolution 3D Faces and Bodies Using VQ-VAE-2 with PixelSNAIL Networks on 2D Representations.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Decreased Activity of Erythrocyte Catalase and Glutathione Peroxidase in Patients with Schizophrenia.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 8, 2025

Creation of Patient-Specific Silicone Cardiac Models with Applications in Pre-surgical Plans and Hands-on Training
09:15

Creation of Patient-Specific Silicone Cardiac Models with Applications in Pre-surgical Plans and Hands-on Training

Published on: February 10, 2022

3.7K

Towards Effective Patient Simulators.

Vadim Liventsev1,2, Aki Härmä2, Milan Petković1,2

  • 1Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
|January 3, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study compares patient simulators for training and algorithm development. Three novel simulators (HeartPole, GraphSim, Auto-ALS) are introduced and evaluated against existing models.

Keywords:
clinical methodshealthcaremarkov decision chainreinforcemenet learningsimulators and models

More Related Videos

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing
11:45

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing

Published on: August 17, 2022

2.2K
Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 8, 2025

Creation of Patient-Specific Silicone Cardiac Models with Applications in Pre-surgical Plans and Hands-on Training
09:15

Creation of Patient-Specific Silicone Cardiac Models with Applications in Pre-surgical Plans and Hands-on Training

Published on: February 10, 2022

3.7K
Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing
11:45

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing

Published on: August 17, 2022

2.2K
Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Simulation
  • Computational Modeling
  • Healthcare Education

Background:

  • Patient simulators are crucial for training healthcare professionals and advancing clinical decision support systems.
  • Existing simulators vary in complexity and data-driven approaches, necessitating a comparative analysis.
  • The development of accurate and versatile patient simulators is essential for improving patient care and medical training.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of patient simulator technologies.
  • To introduce and evaluate three novel patient simulators: HeartPole, GraphSim, and Auto-ALS.
  • To compare existing and proposed simulators qualitatively and quantitatively.

Main Methods:

  • Overview of patient simulator field.
  • Development of three novel simulators: HeartPole (rule-based), GraphSim (graph-based), and Auto-ALS (educational software adaptation).
  • Qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis of all simulators.

Main Results:

  • Introduction of HeartPole, GraphSim, and Auto-ALS with varying representational accuracies.
  • Comparative analysis highlighting strengths and weaknesses of each simulator type.
  • Demonstration of the utility of patient simulators in training and algorithm development.

Conclusions:

  • Patient simulators offer diverse applications in healthcare training and clinical decision support.
  • The proposed simulators provide new options with different levels of accuracy and complexity.
  • Comparative evaluation is vital for selecting appropriate simulators for specific medical applications.