Performance of Japanese patients in registrational studies

Yasushi Goto1, Sayaka Arakawa1, Masayuki Shirasawa1

  • 1Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045 Japan.

Abstract

Insights

Japanese patients generally show comparable treatment results to global populations in lung cancer trials. Early approvals for new lung cancer agents in Japan are achievable through global studies or domestic trials, ensuring timely access to novel therapies.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Drug Development

Background:

  • Accelerated development of lung cancer treatments necessitates global studies for approval.
  • Real-world treatment efficacy can be influenced by varying standards of care.
  • Japan's role in global pharmaceutical research and development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of genomic targeted agents and immune therapies in Japanese patients.
  • To compare outcomes from Japanese domestic trials with global trial data.
  • To understand the approval and reimbursement landscape for new lung cancer treatments in Japan.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 18 genomic targeted agents and immune therapies approved after 2000.
  • Inclusion of data from Japanese domestic trials and global trials with Japanese subsets.
  • Review of drug applications submitted for treatment approval in Japan.

Main Results:

  • Japan frequently grants early approval and full reimbursement for new cancer agents.
  • Domestic trials for alectinib and nivolumab led to their early approval.
  • Japanese patient participation in global pivotal studies (1.1-15.8%) showed comparable results to the overall population.
  • Four agents showed less overall survival improvement, potentially due to differing post-protocol therapies in Japan.

Conclusions:

  • Positive global trial results are often replicated in Japanese patients, establishing new treatment standards.
  • Early drug approval in Japan is facilitated by participation in global registrational studies or domestic Phase II trials.
  • Ensuring equitable access and managing potential efficacy differences for new agents in Japan is crucial for future cancer treatment.

Related Concept Videos

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
11
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
3.7K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
9.6K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
191
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

Body:In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
11
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
765