Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019
HARM revisited: Etiology of subarachnoid hyperintensities in brain FLAIR MRI
Katharina Althaus1, Martin Kasel2, Albert C Ludolph1
1Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Background:
The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) describes a phenomenon with a hyperintense signal in the subarachnoid space in Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, presumably based on blood-brain barrier breakdown in acute stroke with reperfusion. However, this imaging phenomenon was described in other medical conditions.
Aim:
Determination of the prevalence and associated clinical findings of this phenomenon in a large sample of patients with different neurological conditions.
Methods:
This is retrospective, single-center, observational study of 23,948 cerebral MRIs acquired in a Neurological University Clinic over 5 years. The prevalence of HARM, the underlying diagnosis, and damage pattern were examined by chart analysis; MRI was analyzed regarding the type of acute lesions, extent of microangiopathic lesions, and whether gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) was given.
Results:
Among the MRI data, 84 images (0.35%) from 61 patients were HARM-positive without a subarachnoid signal abnormality in any other sequence. Etiologies were heterogeneous; 35 patients had a cerebrovascular disease (CVD; 19 patients received recanalization therapy), 12 patients had an inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) disease and 14 patients had epilepsy. GBCA was applied to 64% of the patients.
Conclusion:
HARM was a rare radiological finding in a range of different neurological pathologies, not limited to stroke, or to previous reperfusion therapy and was not dependent on previous GBCA administration. Our data suggest that the term is too narrow in terms of the concepts of the underlying pathology. We propose to use the term FLAIR Subarachnoid Hyperintensity ("FLASH") phenomenon which might better reflect the observation that the radiological sign can be associated with a variety of central neurological conditions without a straightforward association with therapy.
Insights
The FLAIR Subarachnoid Hyperintensity (FLASH) phenomenon is a rare finding in various neurological conditions, not exclusive to stroke or reperfusion therapy. This radiological sign is not dependent on contrast agent administration.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Radiology
- Neuroimaging
Background:
- The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) is an MRI finding in the subarachnoid space, linked to blood-brain barrier breakdown in stroke.
- This HARM phenomenon has been observed in conditions beyond acute stroke with reperfusion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of HARM in a large patient cohort with diverse neurological conditions.
- To identify associated clinical findings and underlying pathologies of the HARM phenomenon.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, single-center observational study of 23,948 cerebral MRIs over 5 years.
- Analysis of HARM prevalence, diagnoses, and MRI characteristics, including contrast agent use.
Main Results:
- HARM was identified in 84 images (0.35%) from 61 patients, without other subarachnoid abnormalities.
- Etiologies included cerebrovascular disease (19 with recanalization therapy), inflammatory CNS disease, and epilepsy.
- Gadolinium-based contrast agent was administered to 64% of HARM-positive patients.
Conclusions:
- HARM is a rare radiological finding associated with diverse neurological pathologies, not solely stroke or reperfusion.
- The term HARM is considered too narrow; the proposed term FLAIR Subarachnoid Hyperintensity (FLASH) phenomenon better reflects its association with various CNS conditions.
- The presence of FLASH is not dependent on GBCA administration.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

