HARM revisited: Etiology of subarachnoid hyperintensities in brain FLAIR MRI

Katharina Althaus1, Martin Kasel2, Albert C Ludolph1

  • 1Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Abstract

Insights

The FLAIR Subarachnoid Hyperintensity (FLASH) phenomenon is a rare finding in various neurological conditions, not exclusive to stroke or reperfusion therapy. This radiological sign is not dependent on contrast agent administration.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Radiology
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) is an MRI finding in the subarachnoid space, linked to blood-brain barrier breakdown in stroke.
  • This HARM phenomenon has been observed in conditions beyond acute stroke with reperfusion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the prevalence of HARM in a large patient cohort with diverse neurological conditions.
  • To identify associated clinical findings and underlying pathologies of the HARM phenomenon.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective, single-center observational study of 23,948 cerebral MRIs over 5 years.
  • Analysis of HARM prevalence, diagnoses, and MRI characteristics, including contrast agent use.

Main Results:

  • HARM was identified in 84 images (0.35%) from 61 patients, without other subarachnoid abnormalities.
  • Etiologies included cerebrovascular disease (19 with recanalization therapy), inflammatory CNS disease, and epilepsy.
  • Gadolinium-based contrast agent was administered to 64% of HARM-positive patients.

Conclusions:

  • HARM is a rare radiological finding associated with diverse neurological pathologies, not solely stroke or reperfusion.
  • The term HARM is considered too narrow; the proposed term FLAIR Subarachnoid Hyperintensity (FLASH) phenomenon better reflects its association with various CNS conditions.
  • The presence of FLASH is not dependent on GBCA administration.