Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
On the fat saturation effect in quantitative ultrashort TE MR imaging
Yanjun Chen1,2, Liang Li2,3, Nicole Le2,4
1Department of Medical Imaging, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Fat saturation (FatSat) in quantitative UTE imaging of knee tissues shows good correlation and agreement with non-FatSat scans. While some quantitative biomarkers differ slightly, overall results indicate reliable UTE imaging for knee joint assessment.
Area of Science:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Biomaterials Science
- Orthopedics
Background:
- Quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging offers valuable insights into knee tissue composition.
- Fat saturation (FatSat) is a common technique to improve image quality by suppressing fat signal.
- The impact of FatSat on quantitative UTE biomarkers in knee joint tissues requires detailed investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of FatSat on quantitative measurements obtained using three different UTE sequences at 3T.
- To assess the differences, correlations, and agreements of UTE biomarkers with and without FatSat in knee cartilage, meniscus, and whole cadaveric specimens.
Main Methods:
- Three quantitative UTE sequences were employed: multi-echo for T1 measurement, adiabatic T1ρ prepared UTE for T1ρ measurement, and MT-prepared UTE for MTR and MMF.
- Cartilage, meniscus samples, and whole knee cadaveric specimens were imaged with and without FatSat.
- Quantitative difference ratio (QDR), correlation, and agreement analyses were performed to compare FatSat and non-FatSat scans.
Main Results:
- Fat suppression was effective across all three UTE sequences with FatSat.
- QDR values ranged from 0.2% to 12.6%, indicating generally small differences between FatSat and non-FatSat scans.
- Most quantitative biomarkers (T1ρ, MTR, MMF) showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) with FatSat, except for T1ρ in muscle and MMF in meniscus.
- T1 measurements showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) between FatSat and non-FatSat scans.
- Strong correlations were observed for all biomarkers between scans with and without FatSat.
Conclusions:
- Quantitative UTE biomarkers demonstrate good correlation and agreement between scans with and without FatSat.
- While slight differences exist, FatSat can be reliably used in quantitative UTE imaging of knee tissues.
- These findings support the utility of FatSat in enhancing UTE imaging protocols for knee joint assessment.
More Related Videos
07:59Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
Published on: September 7, 2018
09:21Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images
Published on: February 18, 2015