Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
Published on: July 18, 2020
Improving Child Development Screening: Implications for Professional Practice and Patient Equity
John Meurer1, Robert Rohloff2, Lisa Rein1
1Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Insights
Pediatric clinics enhanced child developmental screening using electronic health records (EHR) and workflow improvements, increasing rates from 60% to over 95%. However, disparities in screening and referrals persisted for vulnerable populations.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health
- Quality Improvement Science
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Child developmental screening is crucial for early identification of concerns.
- Implementing standardized screening processes in pediatric settings can be challenging.
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) offer potential for improving screening workflows.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and evaluate a multifaceted approach to improve child developmental screening rates.
- To assess the impact of workflow processes and EHRs on developmental screening.
- To identify disparities in screening and referral based on patient demographics.
Main Methods:
- A pediatric group with 25 clinics and 150 providers utilized quality improvement interventions.
- Interventions included appointing champions, staff training, standardized tools, plan-do-study-act cycles, EHR prompts, financial incentives, and monitoring.
- Data from EHRs were analyzed for screening documentation, results, and referrals; 15 professionals were interviewed.
Main Results:
- Screening rates increased from 60% to over 95% across three age groups (8-36 months) for over 30,000 children.
- Significant disparities were observed in screening and referral rates based on insurance status, race/ethnicity, and income.
- Developmental screening results varied significantly by gender, race/ethnicity, insurance, and income.
Conclusions:
- A multifaceted approach effectively improved child developmental screening rates and was valued by providers.
- Demographic analyses revealed persistent disparities in screening and referral services for vulnerable families.
- Ongoing quality improvement, research, and advocacy are essential to address health inequities.
Introduction And Objectives:
A pediatric group with 25 clinics and 150 providers used multifaceted approaches to implement workflow processes and an electronic health record (EHR) flowsheet to improve child developmental screening. The key outcome was developmental screening done for every patient during 3 periods between ages 8 and 36 months. Identification of developmental concerns was the secondary study outcome. Screening rates and referrals were hypothesized to be optimized for children regardless of demographic backgrounds.
Methods:
During preventive visits, developmental screens targeted patients in age groups 8 to 12, 13 to 24, and 25 to 36 months. EHRs were analyzed for screening documentation, results, and referrals by patient demographics. Fifteen pediatric professionals were interviewed about their qualitative experiences. Quality improvement interventions included appointing clinic champions, training staff about the screening process and responsibilities, using a standardized tool, employing plan-do-study-act cycles, posting EHR prompts, providing financial incentives, and monitoring screening rates using control charts.
Results:
Within 25 months, screening rates improved from 60% to >95% within the 3 preventive visit age groups for a total of more than 30 000 children. Professionals valued the team process improvements. Children enrolled in Medicaid, black children, and those living in lower income zip codes had lower screening rates than privately insured, white children, and those living in higher income areas. Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd edition results were significantly different by gender, race/ethnicity, insurance, and income categories across all groups. Referral rates varied by race/ethnicity and zip code of residence.
Conclusions:
This project resulted in an effective and efficient process to improve child developmental screening that was valued by pediatric professionals. Analyses of patient demographics revealed disparities in services for the most vulnerable families. Ongoing quality improvement, health services research, and advocacy offer hope to improve health equity.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...

