Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Functional Angioplasty: Definitions, Historical Overview, and Future Perspectives
Hanbit Park1, Do-Yoon Kang2, Cheol Whan Lee3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) may relieve angina but not improve prognosis. Complete revascularization (CR) of ischemia-causing lesions may improve outcomes, but definitions of inducible myocardial ischemia lack standardization.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common treatment for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).
- While its role in acute coronary syndromes is clear, its benefit in stable CAD, particularly regarding prognosis, remains debated.
- PCI often alleviates angina symptoms but may not alter long-term outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current understanding of myocardial ischemia in stable CAD.
- To evaluate the evidence supporting PCI guidance and complete revascularization (CR).
- To discuss challenges in defining inducible myocardial ischemia and propose ideal definitions and PCI strategies.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing studies on myocardial ischemia, PCI, and revascularization strategies.
- Analysis of diagnostic tools for assessing inducible myocardial ischemia.
- Discussion of clinical relevance of ischemia hallmarks like ECG changes and wall motion abnormalities.
Main Results:
- Complete revascularization (CR) of all ischemia-causing lesions may be associated with better outcomes compared to incomplete revascularization.
- Inconsistent definitions of inducible myocardial ischemia across studies hinder direct comparisons.
- No universally agreed-upon reference standard exists for diagnosing inducible myocardial ischemia.
Conclusions:
- Standardizing the definition of inducible myocardial ischemia is crucial for comparing study outcomes.
- Clinically relevant ischemia hallmarks may serve as a reference standard.
- Optimizing PCI strategy based on a clear definition of ischemia is essential for improving patient prognosis in stable CAD.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
06:53A Rat Carotid Artery Pressure-Controlled Segmental Balloon Injury with Periadventitial Therapeutic Application
Published on: July 9, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Mechanism of Angiogenesis
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...