Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

5.3K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
5.3K
Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

4.6K
DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
4.6K
Mutations in Microorganisms01:18

Mutations in Microorganisms

158
Mutations are heritable changes in an organism’s genome involving alterations in the base sequence of DNA or RNA. These changes can influence cellular processes and phenotypic traits, potentially transforming the unaltered wild type into a mutant form. Such changes, termed forward mutations, are pivotal in shaping the genetic diversity of organisms.RNA viruses exhibit the highest mutation rates due to the absence of robust proofreading mechanisms during genome replication. In contrast,...
158
Spontaneous and Induced Mutations01:30

Spontaneous and Induced Mutations

285
Spontaneous mutations arise infrequently during DNA replication due to errors in the process. A key factor behind these errors is tautomeric shifts in nitrogenous bases, where bases transition from keto to enol forms or amino to imino forms. This shift can alter base-pairing rules, leading to mutations. Additionally, reactive oxygen species (ROS) arising from aerobic metabolism can damage DNA, resulting in depurination (loss of a purine base) or depyrimidination (loss of a pyrimidine base).
285
Mutations01:39

Mutations

85.3K
Overview
85.3K
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell02:21

Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell

13.2K
Cancer arises from mutations in the critical genes that allow healthy cells to escape cell cycle regulation and acquire the ability to proliferate indefinitely. Though originating from a single mutation event in one of the originator cells, cancer progresses when the mutant cell lines continue to gain more and more mutations, and finally, become malignant. For example, chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) develops initially as a non-lethal increase in white blood cells, which progressively...
13.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cost of Altered Translation Accuracy Shapes Adaptation to Antibiotics in E. coli.

Molecular biology and evolution·2025
Same author

Founders predict trait evolution and population performance after evolutionary rescue in the red flour beetle.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

The role of environmental stress in promoting mutators through evolutionary rescue: quantitative predictions.

Genetics·2025
Same author

Mutation bias alters the distribution of fitness effects of mutations.

PLoS biology·2025
Same author

Is Drosophila Larval Competition Involved in Incipient Speciation?

Journal of chemical ecology·2025
Same author

Cell shape affects bacterial colony growth under physical confinement.

Nature communications·2024
Same journal

The role of microbial resource mutualists in plant adaptation to abiotic environments.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Museum genomics links MC1R alleles to adaptive winter coat color polymorphism in the long-tailed weasel.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Repeated evolution of iridescence and hindwing tails is associated with morphometric flight proxies in skipper butterflies.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Temperature-dependent competition predicts contrasting outcomes of adjacent secondary contact zones in darters (Percidae:Etheostoma).

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Sex allocation of hermaphrodites in metapopulations with frequent population extinction and recolonization.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

The phylogenetic signal of extinction through the rise and fall of early vertebrates: field of bullets or clustered strike?

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Combining Magnetic Sorting of Mother Cells and Fluctuation Tests to Analyze Genome Instability During Mitotic Cell Aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
11:08

Combining Magnetic Sorting of Mother Cells and Fluctuation Tests to Analyze Genome Instability During Mitotic Cell Aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: October 16, 2014

12.7K

Selection bias in mutation accumulation.

Lindi M Wahl1, Deepa Agashe2

  • 1Mathematics, Western University, London, Canada.

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution
|January 6, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mutation accumulation (MA) experiments can be biased by selection. This study quanties selection effects and presents a correction method for accurate evolutionary parameter estimation in microbial evolution.

Keywords:
Fitness effects of mutationsmathematical modelmicrobial evolutionmutation accumulation

More Related Videos

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.1K
Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

24.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Combining Magnetic Sorting of Mother Cells and Fluctuation Tests to Analyze Genome Instability During Mitotic Cell Aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
11:08

Combining Magnetic Sorting of Mother Cells and Fluctuation Tests to Analyze Genome Instability During Mitotic Cell Aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: October 16, 2014

12.7K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.1K
Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

24.0K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Microbial evolution
  • Population genetics

Background:

  • Mutation accumulation (MA) experiments are crucial for studying evolutionary processes.
  • MA protocols involve microbial population growth between bottlenecks.
  • The influence of selection during growth phases is often assumed to be negligible.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the impact of positive and negative selection in MA studies.
  • To develop a correction for selection bias in MA experiments.
  • To improve the accuracy of estimating evolutionary parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Quantification of selection effects in MA experiments.
  • Development of a bias correction method for beneficial and deleterious mutations.
  • Use of simulated MA experiments to validate the correction.
  • Application of the correction to experimental data.

Main Results:

  • Selective effects significantly bias the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) and mutation rates in MA studies.
  • The proposed correction method accurately reconstructs the true DFE.
  • Positive selection in microbial MA experiments is not negligible and can be corrected.

Conclusions:

  • Selection bias can substantially affect MA experiment results.
  • A novel correction method allows for more accurate estimation of evolutionary parameters.
  • This work refines MA experimental protocols for a better understanding of evolution.