Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

36.8K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
36.8K
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I03:24

Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I

50.3K
The mathematical expression known as the wave function, ψ, contains information about each orbital and the wavelike properties of electrons in an isolated atom. When atoms are bound together in a molecule, the wave functions combine to produce new mathematical descriptions that have different shapes. This process of combining the wave functions for atomic orbitals is called hybridization and is mathematically accomplished by the linear combination of atomic orbitals. The new orbitals that...
50.3K
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II03:35

Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II

34.8K
sp3d and sp3d 2 Hybridization
34.8K
Atomic Orbitals02:44

Atomic Orbitals

38.4K
An atomic orbital represents the three-dimensional regions in an atom where an electron has the highest probability to reside. The radial distribution function indicates the total probability of finding an electron within the thin shell at a distance r from the nucleus. The atomic orbitals have distinct shapes which are determined by l, the angular momentum quantum number. The orbitals are often drawn with a boundary surface, enclosing densest regions of the cloud.
38.4K
Atomic Structure01:17

Atomic Structure

15.0K
The Greek philosopher Democritus proposed that everything on Earth is made up of tiny particles called atomos, Greek for "indivisible," from which the modern term "atom" is derived. In the 19th century, John Dalton proposed the atomic theory that is still largely correct today. He put forth five postulates to explain how atoms made up the world around us. (1) All matter is composed of infinitely small particles or atoms. (2) All atoms of a given element are identical to one...
15.0K
Atomic Radii and Effective Nuclear Charge03:08

Atomic Radii and Effective Nuclear Charge

55.8K
The elements in groups of the periodic table exhibit similar chemical behavior. This similarity occurs because the members of a group have the same number and distribution of electrons in their valence shells.
55.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nanothermodynamics of Hydrogenated Diamond Clusters: Size-Dependent Transition Pressures and Stability.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Incorporating Coulomb interactions with fixed charges in moment tensor potentials and equivariant tensor network potentials.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Boosting the Performance of Pt/C Catalysts via Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Support: Insights from Structural and Electrochemical Characterization.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same author

Moment tensor potential and equivariant tensor network potential with explicit dispersion interactions.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Encapsulated Nickel Nanowires Inside Plasma-treated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Urea Oxidation.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same author

Unlocking the Potential of 1D M<sub>2</sub>X<sub>3</sub>Y<sub>8</sub> Ternary Transition Metal Chalcogenides: A Review.

Nano letters·2025
Same journal

Electron Alchemy with Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials: Case Studies of Local Charge in Bond Dissociation Curves.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Multilevel Fragmentation and Boundary Corrections for Accurate Vibrational Spectra of Large Molecules.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Special Topics: Developments of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Methods in Asia.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Predicting Excited-State Energies from Ground-State Descriptors in Thermally Fluctuating π-Conjugated Molecules.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Many-Body Theory Predictions of Positron Binding Energies in Five-Membered Heterocycles Involving N, O, S, and NH Substituents.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

<i>opt</i>-DDAP: Optimizable Density-Derived Atomic Point Charges via Automatic Differentiation.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation
08:21

Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation

Published on: November 22, 2016

9.8K

Nanohardness from First Principles with Active Learning on Atomic Environments.

Evgeny V Podryabinkin1, Alexander G Kvashnin1, Milad Asgarpour1,2

  • 1Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 3 Nobel Street, Moscow 121025, Russia.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|January 6, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a new method using machine learning and atomistic simulations to accurately predict nanohardness. This approach enables the design of ultra-hard materials at the nanoscale, overcoming experimental limitations.

More Related Videos

Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations
13:56

Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations

Published on: October 12, 2019

7.7K
Probing C84-embedded Si Substrate Using Scanning Probe Microscopy and Molecular Dynamics
13:58

Probing C84-embedded Si Substrate Using Scanning Probe Microscopy and Molecular Dynamics

Published on: September 28, 2016

11.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation
08:21

Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation

Published on: November 22, 2016

9.8K
Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations
13:56

Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations

Published on: October 12, 2019

7.7K
Probing C84-embedded Si Substrate Using Scanning Probe Microscopy and Molecular Dynamics
13:58

Probing C84-embedded Si Substrate Using Scanning Probe Microscopy and Molecular Dynamics

Published on: September 28, 2016

11.9K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Computational Materials Science
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Predicting material hardness at the nanoscale is challenging due to experimental difficulties and the limitations of traditional models.
  • Atomistic simulations offer a potential route for nanoscale material characterization, but require accurate interatomic potentials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel methodology for calculating nanohardness using atomistic simulations.
  • To enable the design of materials with exceptional hardness from first principles, particularly at the nanoscale.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a methodology combining machine-learning interatomic potentials with atomistic simulations of nanoindentation.
  • Fitted machine-learning potentials on-the-fly to quantum-mechanical calculations of local fragments.
  • Calculated nanohardness for diamond, AlN, SiC, BC2N, and Si as a function of load and crystallographic orientation.

Main Results:

  • The methodology accurately predicts nanohardness for various materials, showing good agreement with experimental data from literature.
  • Demonstrated the predictive power of the method across different materials and conditions.
  • Validated the approach by comparing simulation results with calibrated macro- and microhardness values.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed methodology provides a reliable tool for calculating nanohardness with high predictive power.
  • This approach facilitates the *in silico* design of novel, ultra-hard materials.
  • The method is particularly valuable for nanoscale applications where experimental measurements are difficult and empirical models fail.