Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
Published on: April 18, 2025
Global cervical cancer research: A scientometric density equalizing mapping and socioeconomic analysis
Dörthe Brüggmann1, Kathrin Quinkert-Schmolke1, Jenny M Jaque2
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Division of Female Health and Preventive Medicine, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Global cervical cancer research is increasing but unevenly distributed, with the US leading in volume and Scandinavian/Alpine countries leading per capita. Many regions, like Africa and South America, show minimal participation. Strengthening global health initiatives is crucial for broader engagement in cervical cancer research.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Bibliometrics
- Public Health
Background:
- Cervical cancer remains a significant global health burden, particularly in low-income nations, despite advances in its diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.
- Existing studies lack a comprehensive analysis of the worldwide research landscape concerning cervical cancer.
- This study aims to map the global scientific output and research productivity related to cervical cancer.
Observation:
- A systematic review of the Web of Science database identified 22,185 articles on cervical cancer published since 1900.
- The United States leads in absolute research output, followed by China and Japan.
- When normalized by population, Sweden, Austria, and Norway show the highest research activity. Per annual case, Scandinavian and Alpine countries, along with the Netherlands, lead.
- Geographic visualization reveals significant underrepresentation of research from Africa and South America.
Findings:
- Global cervical cancer research output shows a continuous upward trend.
- Research productivity is notably imbalanced across different countries and regions.
- High-income nations dominate both absolute and relative research contributions.
Implications:
- The findings highlight disparities in global cervical cancer research participation.
- There is a need to enhance global and public health aspects within cervical carcinoma research.
- Empowering more countries to participate in international research collaborations is essential to address global health inequities in cervical cancer research.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Causality in Epidemiology
Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer
RSV is a retrovirus that contains two copies of a plus-strand RNA genome. Its genome consists of four main open...

