Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

09:30
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
Published on: September 13, 2018
9.7K
Lerna: transformer architectures for configuring error correction tools for short- and long-read genome sequencing.
Atul Sharma1, Pranjal Jain2, Ashraf Mahgoub1
1Purdue University, West Lafayette, US.
BMC Bioinformatics
|January 7, 2022
Summary
Lerna automates the optimization of error correction (EC) tools for genome assembly. This method uses a language model to tune parameters without a reference genome, improving assembly quality and speed.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Sequencing technologies introduce errors, necessitating error correction (EC) for accurate downstream analysis.
- Manual configuration of EC tools is suboptimal, as optimal parameters are dataset- and tool-dependent.
- Evaluating EC performance typically requires a reference genome, which is not always available.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce Lerna, a tool for automated configuration of k-mer-based EC tools.
- To develop a method for optimizing EC parameters without relying on a reference genome.
- To improve de novo genome assembly quality through automated EC optimization.
Main Methods:
- Lerna constructs a language model (LM) of uncorrected genomic reads.
- It calculates a perplexity metric using the LM to evaluate corrected reads for various parameter settings.
- The tool identifies parameters yielding the highest alignment rate by correlating perplexity with assembly quality, bypassing the need for a reference genome.
Main Results:
- Optimal k-mer values are dataset-specific, validating the need for automated selection.
- The perplexity metric, estimated by attention-based transformers, effectively predicts EC performance.
- Lerna demonstrates strong negative correlation between perplexity and alignment rate/assembly quality, enabling automated k-mer tuning.
- The approach achieves significant runtime improvements (18x faster) due to optimized model architecture and GPU utilization.
Conclusions:
- Lerna enhances de novo genome assembly by optimizing EC tools.
- The developed method automates parameter tuning without requiring a reference genome.
- The code is publicly available for broader research use.
Keywords:
Automated configuration tuningError correctionNanopore readsNatural language processing (NLP)PacBio readsParameter search spacePerplexity metricTransformer networksMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Next-generation Sequencing
93.7K
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
93.7K
Genome Annotation and Assembly
19.5K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
19.5K
Genome Copying Errors
4.6K
DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
4.6K
Improving Translational Accuracy
12.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
12.0K

