Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
Published on: February 2, 2020
An Evaluation of Texture-Modified Diets Compliant with the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative in
Xiaojing Sharon Wu1, Anna Miles2, Andrea Braakhuis3
1Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand. Xiaojing.wu@auckland.ac.nz.
Abstract:
Texture-modified diets (TMDs) are commonly prescribed for older adults with swallowing difficulties to improve swallowing safety. The International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) provides a framework for terminology, definitions and testing of TMDs. This observational mixed-method study used the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to establish the barriers and enablers to IDDSI adoption in aged-care facilities (ACFs). Five New Zealand ACFs who had adopted IDDSI > 12 months previously were recruited. Evaluation tools were developed based on CFIR constructs, integrating data from (i) mealtime observations; (ii) manager interviews and (iii) staff (nursing, carers and kitchen) self-administrated surveys. All facility and kitchen managers were IDDSI aware and had access to online resources. Three sites had changed to commercially compliant products post-IDDSI adoption, which had cost implications. Awareness of IDDSI amongst staff ranged from 5 to 79% and < 50% of staff surveyed felt sufficiently trained. Awareness was greater in large sites and where IDDSI was mandated by head office. Managers had not mandated auditing and they felt this had led to reduced perceived importance. Managers felt staff required more training and staff wanted more training, believing it would improve food safety and quality of care. Lack of a dedicated project leader and no speech pathologist on-site were perceived barriers. Collaboration between healthcare assistants, kitchen staff and allied health assisted implementation. ACF staff were aware of IDDSI but staff awareness was low. Using the CFIR, site specific and generic barriers and enablers were identified to improve future implementation effectiveness. Managers and staff want access to regular training. Multidisciplinary collaboration and improving communication are essential. ACFs should consider TMD auditing regularly. Successful implementation of IDDSI allows improvement of quality of care and patient safety but requires a systematic, site-specific implementation plan.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
Taste Buds and Receptors
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients

