Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Ultrasonic Assessment of Myocardial Microstructure
Published on: January 14, 2014
Quantification of murine myocardial infarct size using 2-D and 4-D high-frequency ultrasound
Melissa M Dann1,2,3, Sydney Q Clark4, Natasha A Trzaskalski1,2
1Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Echocardiography accurately quantifies myocardial infarction (MI) size using 2-D and 4-D techniques. Four-dimensional (4-D) ultrasound and strain analysis offer superior insights into left ventricular function and infarct characteristics after ischemic injury.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Echocardiography
- Myocardial Infarction Research
Background:
- Ischemic heart disease is a leading global cause of mortality.
- Severe ischemic heart disease involves coronary artery occlusion, myocardial necrosis, and fibrotic scarring.
- Accurate quantification of infarct size is crucial for assessing disease severity and treatment efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of two-dimensional (2-D) and four-dimensional (4-D) echocardiography for quantifying infarct size in vivo.
- To introduce and assess a novel 4-D strain analysis technique for estimating myocardial infarction (MI) size.
- To compare echocardiographic measurements with histological findings for validation.
Main Methods:
- Experimental myocardial infarction (MI) was induced in mice via left coronary artery ligation.
- Infarct size and ejection fraction were measured using 2-D and 4-D echocardiography.
- Histology was used as the gold standard for comparison with ultrasound-based metrics, analyzed via linear regression.
Main Results:
- 2-D echocardiographic akinetic length, 4-D echocardiographic infarct volume, and surface area showed significant correlation with histological infarct size (r = 0.76 to 0.90, P < 0.05).
- 4-D echocardiography demonstrated superiority in assessing left ventricular and infarct asymmetry compared to 2-D methods.
- 4-D strain analysis, including surface strain and transmural thickness, provided additional accurate infarct sizing techniques correlating well with histology (r = 0.76 to 0.94, P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Both 2-D and 4-D echocardiography are reliable for in vivo infarct size quantification.
- 4-D echocardiography offers a more comprehensive assessment of left ventricular function and structure, particularly in cases of myocardial infarction.
- 4-D strain analysis provides effective methods for measuring fibrotic scarring and regional dysfunction after MI, aiding in the evaluation of therapeutic interventions.
Abstract:
Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States, Canada, and worldwide. Severe disease is characterized by coronary artery occlusion, loss of blood flow to the myocardium, and necrosis of tissue, with subsequent remodeling of the heart wall, including fibrotic scarring. The current study aims to demonstrate the efficacy of quantitating infarct size via two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiographic akinetic length and four-dimensional (4-D) echocardiographic infarct volume and surface area as in vivo analysis techniques. We further describe and evaluate a new surface area strain analysis technique for estimating myocardial infarction (MI) size after ischemic injury. Experimental MI was induced in mice via left coronary artery ligation. Ejection fraction and infarct size were measured through 2-D and 4-D echocardiography. Infarct size established via histology was compared with ultrasound-based metrics via linear regression analysis. Two-dimensional echocardiographic akinetic length (r = 0.76, P = 0.03), 4-D echocardiographic infarct volume (r = 0.85, P = 0.008), and surface area (r = 0.90, P = 0.002) correlate well with histology. Although both 2-D and 4-D echocardiography were reliable measurement techniques to assess infarct, 4-D analysis is superior in assessing asymmetry of the left ventricle and the infarct. Strain analysis performed on 4-D data also provides additional infarct sizing techniques, which correlate with histology (surface strain: r = 0.94, P < 0.001, transmural thickness: r = 0.76, P = 0.001). Two-dimensional echocardiographic akinetic length, 4-D echocardiography ultrasound, and strain provide effective in vivo methods for measuring fibrotic scarring after MI.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study supports that both 2-D and 4-D echocardiographic analysis techniques are reliable in quantifying infarct size though 4-D ultrasound provides a more holistic image of LV function and structure, especially after myocardial infarction. Furthermore, 4-D strain analysis correctly identifies infarct size and regional LV dysfunction after MI. Therefore, these techniques can improve functional insight into the impact of pharmacological interventions on the pathophysiology of cardiac disease.
More Related Videos
09:19Intramyocardial Transplantation of MSC-Loading Injectable Hydrogels after Myocardial Infarction in a Murine Model
Published on: September 20, 2020
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010