Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Anti-Nuclear Antibody Screening Using HEp-2 Cells
Published on: June 23, 2014
Anti-dsDNA Testing Specificity for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review
Michelle E Orme1, Anja Voreck2, Redha Aksouh2
1ICERA Consulting Ltd, Swindon, UK.
Autoantibody specificity varies between tests for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) and fluorescence enzyme immunoassays demonstrate high specificity for anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) detection.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Rheumatology
Background:
- Autoantibody specificity in autoimmune diseases is highly variable.
- Differences in detection methods and tests contribute to variability in autoantibody specificity.
- False-positive results in autoantibody testing can have significant downstream consequences for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive assessment of anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody specificity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
- To evaluate the specificity of various anti-dsDNA detection methods and tests used in SLE diagnosis.
- To provide guidance for laboratory specialists and clinicians in selecting and interpreting anti-dsDNA tests.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of published studies (January 2004 to August 2019) was performed using multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane).
- Cross-sectional or case-control studies reporting anti-dsDNA test accuracy data in SLE patients were included.
- A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate specificity by test method, with study quality assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (version 2).
Main Results:
- Thirty studies encompassing 43 different tests were analyzed.
- The Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay methods demonstrated high specificity (≥90%).
- Specificity was not consistently demonstrated to be ≥90% for other methods, including NOVA Lite, chemiluminescence immunoassays, multiplex immunoassays, and Farr fluorescent immunoassays, with some lacking sufficient data or using potentially overestimating control groups.
Conclusions:
- Anti-dsDNA testing exhibits considerable variation in specificity, impacting SLE patient management.
- Certain methods, such as CLIFT and fluorescence enzyme immunoassays, show promising specificity.
- Further research is needed to clarify the specificity of other anti-dsDNA tests and guide optimal clinical use.
More Related Videos
10:05Simultaneous Distinction of Monospecific and Mixed DFS70 Patterns During ANA Screening with a Novel HEp-2 ELITE/DFS70 Knockout Substrate
Published on: January 17, 2018
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016