Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

296
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
296
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.3K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.0K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.0K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

115
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
115
Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model01:13

Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model

136
Drugs administered through various routes can lead to nonlinear elimination, resulting in complex pharmacokinetic behaviors crucial to understanding efficacious drug dosing.
When a drug is administered through a constant intravenous infusion and eliminated via nonlinear pharmacokinetics, it follows zero-order input. For example, oral drugs undergo first-order absorption upon administration and are eliminated through nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
In the case of subcutaneously administered drugs,...
136

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neurocomputational modeling of rule abstraction and memorization during probabilistic stimulus-reward learning.

iScience·2026
Same author

Expectation violations as an effective alternative to complex mentalizing in novel communication.

iScience·2025
Same author

Prediction errors drive dynamic changes in neural patterns that guide behavior.

Cell reports·2025
Same author

Artificial intelligence speaks up<b>These Strange New Minds: How AI Learned to Talk and What It Means</b> <i>Christopher Summerfield</i> Viking, 2025. 384 pp.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Artificial intelligence speaks up<b>These Strange New Minds: How AI Learned to Talk and What It Means</b> <i>Christopher Summerfield</i> Viking, 2025. 384 pp.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Expectation violations signal goals in novel human communication.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 7, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K

Humans depart from optimal computational models of interactive decision-making during competition under partial

Saurabh Steixner-Kumar1, Tessa Rusch2,3, Prashant Doshi4

  • 1Institute of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. s.steixner-kumar@uke.de.

Scientific Reports
|January 8, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Humans make fewer optimal decisions under uncertainty when competing versus cooperating. Departures from optimal strategies in social decision-making were observed, with learning improving performance but competition leading to costly errors.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

835
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 7, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

835
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Decision Science
  • Cognitive Science
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Decision making under uncertainty in multiagent settings is a growing area of research.
  • Understanding how social contexts influence human interaction and Theory of Mind is crucial.
  • The extent to which human decision-making deviates from computational optimality in social settings remains largely unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate human decision-making under uncertainty in solo versus interactive settings.
  • To adapt the 'Tiger Problem' for studying human social interaction.
  • To analyze how competition and cooperation affect information gathering and decision optimality.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the 'Tiger Problem' paradigm with human participants.
  • Compared decision-making in solo, competitive, and cooperative settings.
  • Analyzed information gathering, decision optimality, learning, and error rates.

Main Results:

  • Participants gathered less information before decisions in competitive settings compared to cooperative ones.
  • Deviations from computational optimality were observed but showed evidence of learning and performance improvement.
  • Competition led to increased costly errors, reduced rewarding actions, and lower accuracy in predicting others' behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Human social interaction under partial information is complex and influenced by competitive versus cooperative contexts.
  • Departures from optimal decision-making are not random but can be modulated by social dynamics and learning.
  • This study offers a novel framework for examining social decision-making and the role of Theory of Mind in uncertain environments.