Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Gestational age at term delivery and children's neurocognitive development
Jessica L Gleason1, Stephen E Gilman2,3, Rajeshwari Sundaram4
1Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Insights
Full-term birth at 40-41 weeks gestation is linked to better neurocognitive outcomes. Delivering earlier, even at 37-39 weeks, is associated with lower developmental scores in children.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Public Health
Background:
- Preterm birth is known to impact neurocognitive performance.
- The neurodevelopmental benefits of extending gestation within the full-term range (37-41 weeks) remain unclear.
- Understanding these differences is crucial given high rates of obstetric intervention in the USA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between gestational age at term (37-41 weeks) and neurocognitive development.
- To determine if neurodevelopmental outcomes improve with each additional week of gestation within the full-term range.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of 39,199 singleton births from the US Collaborative Perinatal Project (1959-1976).
- Neurodevelopmental assessments at 8 months (Bayley Scales), 4 years (Stanford-Binet IQ), and 7 years (WISC, WRAT).
- Evaluated outcomes across each week of term gestation (37-41 weeks).
Main Results:
- Neurocognitive performance improved progressively with each week of gestation from 37 to 40-41 weeks.
- Children born at 37 and 38 weeks showed lower scores across most assessments compared to those born at 40 weeks.
- Birth at 39 weeks was associated with lower Bayley Mental and Psychomotor scores, and in sibling analyses, lower Wide-Range Achievement Test scores.
Conclusions:
- Each week of gestation up to 40-41 weeks is vital for optimal short- and long-term cognitive development.
- The 40-41 week gestational window appears to be ideal for maximizing neurodevelopmental outcomes.
- Findings support optimizing delivery timing for improved child neurodevelopment.
Background:
Preterm birth is associated with lower neurocognitive performance. However, whether children's neurodevelopment improves with longer gestations within the full-term range (37-41 weeks) is unclear. Given the high rate of obstetric intervention in the USA, it is critical to determine whether long-term outcomes differ for children delivered at each week of term.
Methods:
This secondary analysis included 39 199 live-born singleton children of women who were admitted to the hospital in spontaneous labour from the US Collaborative Perinatal Project (1959-76). At each week of term gestation, we evaluated development at 8 months using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 4 years using the Stanford-Binet IQ (SBIQ) domains and 7 years using the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children (WISC) and Wide-Range Achievement Tests (WRAT).
Results:
Children's neurocognitive performance improved with each week of gestation from 37 weeks, peaking at 40 or 41 weeks. Relative to those delivered at 40 weeks, children had lower neurocognitive scores at 37 and 38 weeks for all assessments except SBIQ and WISC Performance IQ. Children delivered at 39 weeks had lower Bayley Mental (β = -1.18; confidence interval -1.77, -0.58) and Psychomotor (β = -1.18; confidence interval -1.90, -0.46) scores. Results were similar for within-family analyses comparing siblings, with the addition of lower WRAT scores at 39 weeks.
Conclusions:
The improvement in development scores across assessment periods indicates that each week up to 40 or 41 weeks of gestation is important for short- and long-term cognitive development, suggesting 40-41 weeks may be the ideal delivery window for optimal neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Information Processing Approach
Biological Influences on Intelligence
The Nativist Approach
Teratogenicity
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Language and Cognition

