Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Gastrulation

Gastrulation

Gastrulation establishes the three primary tissues of an embryo: the ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. This developmental process relies on a series of intricate cellular movements, which in humans transforms a flat, “bilaminar disc” composed of two cell sheets into a three-tiered structure. In the resulting embryo, the endoderm serves as the bottom layer, and stacked directly above it is the intermediate mesoderm, and then the uppermost ectoderm. Respectively, these tissue strata...

Determination

Determination

During embryogenesis, cells become progressively committed to different fates through a two-step process: specification followed by determination. Specification is demonstrated by removing a segment of an early embryo, “neutrally” culturing the tissue in vitro—for example, in a petri dish with simple medium—and then observing the derivatives. If the cultured region gives rise to cell types that it would normally generate in the embryo, this means that it is specified. In...

Position-effect Variegation

Position-effect Variegation

In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Development in the progress of overfeeding machinery for <i>foie gras</i> production.

British poultry science·2026

Same author

Incorporating Intensity Modulated Total Body Irradiation (IMRT-TBI) Into Future Cooperative Group Clinical Trials: An NRG Hematologic Malignancies Working Group-Led Report From the National Clinical Trials Network.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026

Same author

Recent Advances in Hypothalamic Segmentation for Neuroimaging: A Comprehensive Review.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2025

Same author

[Risk factors for surgical site infection after colorectal cancer surgery: a two-center retrospective study].

Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery·2025

Same author

Multimodal Language Model for Jaw Osteonecrosis Diagnosis and Treatment.

Journal of dental research·2025

Same author

Comprehensive estimation of overfeeding influence on goose meat quality.

British poultry science·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras

Published on: May 31, 2014

Transcriptome profiling of morphogenetic differences between contour and flight feathers in duck.

Q Xu¹, Y Xi¹, S Ma¹

¹Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, P.R. China.

British Poultry Science

|January 10, 2022

Summary

This study identified key genes and molecular pathways regulating feather development in ducks. Findings reveal crucial gene networks for contour and flight feather morphogenesis, aiding future research into feather structure.

Keywords:

Feather morphogenesis contour feather ducks flight feather transcriptome

More Related Videos

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Published on: February 18, 2021

Analysis of Neural Crest Migration and Differentiation by Cross-species Transplantation

Analysis of Neural Crest Migration and Differentiation by Cross-species Transplantation

Published on: February 7, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras

Published on: May 31, 2014

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Published on: February 18, 2021

Analysis of Neural Crest Migration and Differentiation by Cross-species Transplantation

Analysis of Neural Crest Migration and Differentiation by Cross-species Transplantation

Published on: February 7, 2012

Area of Science:

Genomics and Molecular Biology
Developmental Biology
Animal Science

Background:

Feather morphogenesis is a complex process involving intricate molecular networks.
Understanding the genetic basis of feather type differentiation is crucial for avian biology.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate transcriptomic differences between contour and flight feather follicles in ducks.
To identify candidate genes and molecular pathways governing feather morphogenesis.

Main Methods:

High-throughput RNA sequencing was employed to analyze gene expression profiles.
Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) was used to identify key gene modules and hub genes.
Differential gene expression analysis was performed between feather types and breeds.

Main Results:

Thousands of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between contour and flight feather follicles.
Two key gene modules associated with feather morphogenesis were identified, enriched in pathways like Wnt signaling and focal adhesion.
Candidate genes (e.g., CCNA2, TTK, PRSS23, LAMC1) and transcription factors (e.g., SMAD1, KLF10) regulating feather morphology were pinpointed.

Conclusions:

This study provides a comprehensive transcriptomic landscape of duck feather follicles.
The identified genes and pathways offer valuable insights into the genetic control of feather type determination.
Findings contribute to a deeper understanding of avian feather development and evolution.