Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025
Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 27, 2022
Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the Neurotrauma Research Panel Delphi Survey
Deborah M Stein1, Maxwell A Braverman, Jimmy Phuong
1From the Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine (D.M.S.), Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education (J.P.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Coalition for National Trauma Research (M.A.B., E.S., M.A.P., P.J.B.), San Antonio, Texas; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic (P.D.A.), Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Child Health (P.D.A.), University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Neurological Surgery (B.M.A.), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.X.C.), Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia; Department of Orthopaedics, Augusta University Health (J.G.D.), Augusta, Georgia; Department of Anesthesiology (S.M.G.), Department of Orthopaedics (D.E.G.), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Neurosurgery (O.H.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California; Department of Emergency Medicine (C.S.K.), Madigan Army Medicine Center, Tacoma, Washington; Department of Neurosurgery (R.S.K.), McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas; R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center (K.A.M.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Surgery (M.B.P.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; Department of Neurosurgery (C.S.R.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery (A.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Critical Care Medicine (L.S.), Neurology & Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburg, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Neurosurgery (A.B.V.), Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia; Department of Surgery (E.M.B.), Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Background:
In 2016, the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine called for the development of a National Trauma Research Action Plan. The Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. Given the public health burden of injuries to the central nervous system, neurotrauma was one of 11 panels formed to address this recommendation with a gap analysis and generation of high-priority research questions.
Methods:
We recruited interdisciplinary experts to identify gaps in the neurotrauma literature, generate research questions, and prioritize those questions using a consensus-driven Delphi survey approach. We conducted four Delphi rounds in which participants generated key research questions and then prioritized the importance of the questions on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as 60% or greater of panelists agreeing on the priority category. We then coded research questions using an National Trauma Research Action Plan taxonomy of 118 research concepts, which were consistent across all 11 panels.
Results:
Twenty-eight neurotrauma experts generated 675 research questions. Of these, 364 (53.9%) reached consensus, and 56 were determined to be high priority (15.4%), 303 were deemed to be medium priority (83.2%), and 5 were low priority (1.4%). The research topics were stratified into three groups-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), mild TBI (mTBI), and spinal cord injury. The number of high-priority questions for each subtopic was 46 for severe TBI (19.7%), 3 for mTBI (4.3%) and 7 for SCI (11.7%).
Conclusion:
This Delphi gap analysis of neurotrauma research identified 56 high-priority research questions. There are clear areas of focus for severe TBI, mTBI, and spinal cord injury that will help guide investigators in future neurotrauma research. Funding agencies should consider these gaps when they prioritize future research.
Level Of Evidence:
Diagnostic Test or Criteria, Level IV.
