Differences in detection patterns, characteristics, and outcomes of central and peripheral lung cancers in low-dose...

Although low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is known to be effective for the detection of lung cancers localized in peripheral lung regions at a curable stage, limited data is available regarding the characteristics and outcomes of central lung cancers diagnosed in a screening cohort. This study aimed to determine whether LDCT screening could effectively detect central lung cancers at an early stage and offer survival benefits.

We analyzed 52,615 adults who underwent lung cancer screening with LDCT between May 2003 and Dec 2019 at a tertiary center in South Korea. Characteristics and outcomes of those diagnosed with lung cancer, stratified by screen-detection status and cancer location, were evaluated.

A total of 352 individuals (281 screen-detected, 71 non-screen-detected) were diagnosed with lung cancer. Compared to screen-detected cancers, non-screen-detected cancers tended to be centrally-located (11.4% vs. 64.8%, P<0.001). Most non-screen-detected central cancers (89.1%) had a negative result on prior LDCT screening. Multivariable regression analyses revealed that for peripheral cancers, screen-detection was associated with a significantly lower probability of diagnosis at an advanced stage [III/IV, odds ratio (OR) =0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.45] and mortality [hazard ratio (HR) =0.33, 95% CI: 0.13-0.84]; however, the association was insignificant for central cancers. For screen-detected cancers, central location, compared to peripheral location, was significantly associated with a higher risk of diagnosis at an advanced stage (OR =20.83, 95% CI: 6.67-64.98) and mortality (HR =4.98, 95% CI: 2.26-10.97).

Unlike for peripheral cancers, LDCT screening did not demonstrate an improvement in outcomes of central lung cancers, indicating an important limitation of LDCT screening and the need for developing novel modalities to screen and treat central lung cancer.