Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Layer Microdissection of Tricuspid Valve Leaflets for Biaxial Mechanical Characterization and Microstructural Quantification
Published on: February 10, 2022
Subclinical Leaflets Thrombosis After Transcatheter Replacement of Bicuspid vs. Tricuspid Aortic Valve
Gangjie Zhu1,2, Jiaqi Fan1, Dao Zhou1,2
1Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Insights
Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) occurred similarly in bicuspid (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Age and anticoagulation predicted SLT, with no significant clinical event differences observed.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Radiology
Background:
- Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) is a critical factor impacting bioprosthetic valve durability.
- Understanding SLT's effect in bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) is crucial for long-term outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence and impact of CT-defined SLT in patients with BAV versus tricuspid aortic valves (TAV) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
- To identify predictors of SLT and assess clinical events in BAV and TAV populations post-TAVR.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 170 BAV and 201 TAV patients who underwent TAVR.
- Multidetector computed tomography (CT) performed at 30 days and 1-year post-procedure to assess for hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT), a marker for SLT.
- Comparison of hemodynamic parameters (mean aortic gradient, effective orifice area) and clinical events between groups.
Main Results:
- The incidence of HALT at 30 days and 1-year was comparable between BAV and TAV groups (34.9% vs. 36.7% at 1 year).
- While mean aortic gradient was similar, effective orifice area at 1-year was significantly different (p=0.004).
- Age and anticoagulation were identified as independent predictors of SLT at 1-year in both BAV and TAV groups. No significant difference in clinical events was noted between HALT and no-HALT groups.
Conclusions:
- CT-defined subclinical leaflet thrombosis is comparable between BAV and TAV patients in the first year post-TAVR.
- Age and anticoagulation status are key predictors for SLT development after TAVR.
- No significant differences in clinical events were observed between BAV and TAV groups at the 1-year follow-up, irrespective of HALT presence.
Abstract:
Background: Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) is an important sequela that compromises the durability of the bioprosthetic valve. Objectives: To better determine the effect of SLT in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), we performed a retrospective assessment of CT-defined SLT in BAV and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) stenotic patients. Methods: We consecutively collected patients undergoing the TAVR between August 2015 and March 2020 in our center. A total of 170 BAV and 201 TAV cases were enrolled. Multidetector computed tomography was performed within 30 days and at 1-year. Results: Twenty cases in the BAV group and 19 cases in the TAV group had hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) in 30 days (12.5 vs. 9.9%, p = 0.449), and 52 cases in BAV and 61 cases in TAV had the HALT (34.9 vs. 36.7%, p = 0.733) at 1-year follow-up. The mean aortic gradient (MAG) and effective orifice areas (EOA) values were comparable between the two groups at 30 days (HALT vs. no HALT; 10.8 ± 4.8 vs. 11.3 ± 6.0, p = 0.638; 1.6 ± 0.4 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3, p = 0.724), and still, no difference was observed in the MAG at 1-year (11.5 ± 5.6 vs. 10.6 ± 5.1, p = 0.164). However, the EOA at 1-year was statistically different between the two groups (1.5 ± 0.3 vs. 1.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.004). The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated the anticoagulation and age as independent predictors both in the BAV and TAV groups at 1-year. There was no difference in clinical events between the HALT and no HALT group in relevant to BAV or TAV at 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: The presence of subclinical leaflet thrombosis defined by the CT was comparable between the BAV and TAV in the first year after the TAVR procedure. Age and anticoagulation were the independent predictors of the subclinical leaflet thrombosis at 1 year after the TAVR. There was no difference in relevant clinical events between the BAV and TAV groups at 1-year follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

