Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Biological subphenotypes in severe acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome using rapid prospective classification (SPARC) in the USA: a multicentre, observational, study.

The Lancet. Respiratory medicine·2026

Same author

Evaluation of demineralization changes utilizing the Canary Caries Detection System and various toothpastes on incipient enamel lesions.

European oral research·2026

Same author

The effect of pH on the mechanical properties of beta titanium orthodontic arch wires.

European oral research·2026

Same author

Multimodal Care and Outcomes of Pancreatic Cancer Patients Are Influenced by Factors Beyond Biology: A Population-Based Study From Louisiana Tumor Registry.

Journal of surgical oncology·2025

Same author

Blood Pressure During Hospital Stay for Delivery and Risk for Postpartum Readmission for Hypertension.

O&G open·2025

Same author

Is Postoperative Steroid Use Associated With Improved Outcomes in Severe Odontogenic Infections?

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2025

Same journal

The 5 Ms Framework: An Opportunity to Mitigate the Risks of Prescription Opioids in Older Adults in Oral Maxillofacial Surgery.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026

Same journal

Are Temporomandibular Disorders in Individuals With Intellectual Disability Overlooked?

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026

Same journal

When Patients Are Subjects.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026

Same journal

Retraction notice to "Compared to intravenous injection of midazolam, does intranasal dexmedetomidine provide adequate sedation for dentoalveolar surgery?" [Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 84/5 (2026) 656-664].

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026

Same journal

RE: Do Cannabis Users Require More Anesthesia During Third Molar Removal Under Intravenous General Anesthesia When Compared to Nonusers?

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026

Same journal

REPLY: Does Drug Type Influence Surgical Outcome in MRONJ? A Comparison Between Denosumab and Zoledronate.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures

Published on: May 16, 2025

Do Patient-Specific Implants Decrease Complications and Increase Orbital Volume Reconstruction Accuracy in Primary

Mari-Alina Timoshchuk¹, Eric J Murnan², Andrew G Chapple³

¹Resident, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA.

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery : Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

|January 10, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Patient-specific implants offer improved accuracy in orbital reconstruction compared to preformed implants. However, this study found no significant reduction in complications when using patient-specific implants for orbital trauma.

More Related Videos

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures

Published on: May 16, 2025

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

Area of Science:

Ophthalmology
Neurosurgery
Biomedical Engineering

Background:

Patient-specific implants (PSIs) are gaining traction for orbital trauma reconstruction.
Limited data currently exists to support their widespread use over traditional preformed implants.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare complication rates and orbital volume reconstruction accuracy between PSIs and preformed titanium mesh implants.
To evaluate the efficacy of PSIs in managing orbital floor and medial wall fractures.

Main Methods:

A retrospective cohort study analyzed 85 patients with orbital fractures treated between 2015 and 2020.
Implant type (PSI vs. preformed) was the primary predictor variable.
Outcomes included percent orbital volume difference and complication rates, analyzed using Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

Main Results:

Patient-specific implants showed a lower percent volume difference (4.2%) compared to preformed implants (6.8%) (P = .03).
Complication rates were 8.3% for PSIs versus 26.2% for preformed implants (P = .08).

Conclusions:

Patient-specific implants enhance the accuracy of orbital volume reconstruction after trauma.
While promising for accuracy, PSIs did not demonstrate a statistically significant decrease in complications compared to preformed implants in this cohort.