Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

14.0K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
14.0K
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

4.1K
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.1K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.6K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.6K
Protein-Protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-Protein Interfaces

3.9K
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Three Unrelated Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Exome Sequencing and Functional Gene Analysis Imply a Role of Laminin-511 in Early Neurodevelopment.

Case reports in genetics·2026
Same author

Mitotic Block and Epigenetic Repression Underlie Neurodevelopmental Defects and Neurobehavioral Deficits in Congenital Heart Disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Novel Protein-Protein Interactions Highlighting the Crosstalk between Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome, Ciliopathies and Neurodevelopmental Delays.

Genes·2022
Same author

Circadian transcription factor NPAS2 and the NAD<sup>+</sup> -dependent deacetylase SIRT1 interact in the mouse nucleus accumbens and regulate reward.

The European journal of neuroscience·2022
Same author

Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Interactome with 364 Novel Protein-Protein Interactions.

Cancers·2021
Same author

Potentially repurposable drugs for COVID-19 identified from SARS-CoV-2 Host Protein Interactome.

Research square·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 7, 2025

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.1K

Benchmark Evaluation of Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction Algorithms.

Brandan Dunham1, Madhavi K Ganapathiraju1

  • 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 11, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Computational prediction of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is crucial, but many methods overestimate their performance. This study re-evaluates PPI prediction algorithms on realistic datasets, revealing inflated results and highlighting the need for robust benchmarking.

Keywords:
computational predictionevaluationinteractomeprotein–protein interactions

More Related Videos

Genome-wide Protein-protein Interaction Screening by Protein-fragment Complementation Assay PCA in Living Cells
08:38

Genome-wide Protein-protein Interaction Screening by Protein-fragment Complementation Assay PCA in Living Cells

Published on: March 3, 2015

13.5K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 7, 2025

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.1K
Genome-wide Protein-protein Interaction Screening by Protein-fragment Complementation Assay PCA in Living Cells
08:38

Genome-wide Protein-protein Interaction Screening by Protein-fragment Complementation Assay PCA in Living Cells

Published on: March 3, 2015

13.5K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Systems Biology

Background:

  • Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are fundamental to cellular functions and biological processes.
  • Understanding the complete PPI network is critical for biomedical research, yet most interactions remain undiscovered.
  • Experimental determination of all PPIs is impractical, necessitating computational prediction methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark the performance of various published computational algorithms for predicting protein-protein interactions (PPIs).
  • To identify and address the issue of exaggerated performance claims in existing PPI prediction methods.
  • To provide reliable evaluation datasets and source code for reproducible PPI prediction research.

Main Methods:

  • Re-implementation of several published PPI prediction algorithms.
  • Evaluation of algorithms using benchmark datasets with realistic positive and negative class proportions.
  • Comparison of algorithm performance against control models utilizing random and 'illogical' features.
  • Assessment of feature types, including sequence, functional, and expression data.

Main Results:

  • Many published PPI prediction algorithms show overstated performance when evaluated on realistic datasets.
  • Several methods were outperformed by control models, indicating limitations in their predictive power.
  • Algorithm performance is influenced by literature bias (over-characterization of proteins) and the scale-free nature of PPI networks.
  • Sequence-only algorithms generally performed worse than those incorporating functional and expression features.

Conclusions:

  • Existing PPI prediction algorithms often provide inflated performance metrics due to inappropriate evaluation datasets.
  • Robust benchmarking with realistic data compositions is essential for accurately assessing PPI prediction tools.
  • Future PPI prediction methods should consider a broader range of features beyond sequence information for improved accuracy.