Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Social norms in indirect reciprocity with ternary reputations
Yohsuke Murase1, Minjae Kim2, Seung Ki Baek3
1RIKEN Center for Computational Science, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan.
Abstract:
Indirect reciprocity is a key mechanism that promotes cooperation in social dilemmas by means of reputation. Although it has been a common practice to represent reputations by binary values, either 'good' or 'bad', such a dichotomy is a crude approximation considering the complexity of reality. In this work, we studied norms with three different reputations, i.e., 'good', 'neutral', and 'bad'. Through massive supercomputing for handling more than thirty billion possibilities, we fully identified which norms achieve cooperation and possess evolutionary stability against behavioural mutants. By systematically categorizing all these norms according to their behaviours, we found similarities and dissimilarities to their binary-reputation counterpart, the leading eight. We obtained four rules that should be satisfied by the successful norms, and the behaviour of the leading eight can be understood as a special case of these rules. A couple of norms that show counter-intuitive behaviours are also presented. We believe the findings are also useful for designing successful norms with more general reputation systems.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
11:51Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity
Social Proof
Social Exchange Theory
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Dark Triad and Person Perception
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other