Atezolizumab with enzalutamide versus enzalutamide alone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a

Thomas Powles1, Kobe C Yuen2, Silke Gillessen3,4

  • 1Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. thomas.powles1@nhs.net.

Nature Medicine
|January 11, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Adding atezolizumab to enzalutamide did not improve overall survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Biomarker analysis suggests potential benefit in select patients with high PD-L1 expression.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Prostate Cancer Research

Background:

  • Early data suggested potential benefit from program death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibition in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
  • Enzalutamide is a standard treatment for CRPC, and combination therapies are being explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of adding atezolizumab to enzalutamide in men with metastatic CRPC.
  • To identify potential biomarkers predictive of response to atezolizumab plus enzalutamide.

Main Methods:

  • The IMbassador250 trial was an open-label, randomized study of 759 men with metastatic CRPC progressing on abiraterone.
  • Patients received either enzalutamide alone or enzalutamide plus atezolizumab.
  • Archival tumor samples were analyzed for immune biomarkers, DNA damage-response alterations, and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) status.

Main Results:

  • The addition of atezolizumab did not meet the primary endpoint of improved overall survival (HR 1.12; P=0.28).
  • Prostate tumors generally showed low expression of key immune biomarkers.
  • Biomarker analyses indicated longer progression-free survival with atezolizumab in patients with high PD-L1 expression (IC2/3), CD8 counts, and immune gene signatures.

Conclusions:

  • Atezolizumab plus enzalutamide did not improve overall survival in unselected patients with metastatic CRPC.
  • Prostate cancer exhibits the immune biology for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, but in a subset of patients.
  • Careful patient selection based on biomarkers may be necessary to identify subgroups who could benefit from atezolizumab therapy.