Clinical utility and safety of biopsy forceps for intestinal endoscopes during endovascular treatment

A 76-year-old female who had a history of endovascular treatment (EVT) for her left superficial femoral artery with endovascular stent grafts [VIABAHN (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., DE, USA)] suddenly experienced intermittent claudication of her left leg. Angiography revealed total occlusion of previous stent grafts, and a thrombus aspiration catheter was used after crossing the guidewire. Since retrograde angiography using a thrombus aspiration catheter revealed a large residual thrombus at the distal edge of the previous stent even after several thrombus aspirations, biopsy forceps for intestinal endoscopes [Radial Jaw (Boston Scientific, MA, USA)] were successfully used to remove that thrombus. After balloon inflation under distal protection, angiography revealed a large residual thrombus at her left common femoral artery with a flow limiting of her deep femoral artery. Again, biopsy forceps were successfully used to remove that thrombus. In this case series, we reported a total of 11 cases which underwent EVT using biopsy forceps for intestinal endoscopes [Radial Jaw (Boston Scientific, MA, USA)]. Of the 11 cases, eight underwent EVT using biopsy forceps for thrombus removal, two underwent calcification removal in severely calcified lesions, and one underwent removal of a detached guidewire. There were no major adverse limb events (MALEs) except for one patient who underwent major amputation after EVT. One MALE occurred independently of biopsy forceps use because biopsy forceps were used only to remove the detached wire. Biopsy forceps for intestinal endoscopes were clinically useful and safe for EVT.