Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
Published on: August 30, 2013
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Recall and False-Positive Rates by Time of Day and Reader
Michael H Bernstein1, Grayson L Baird1, Ana P Lourenco1
1From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy St, 3rd Floor, Providence, RI 02903 (M.H.B., G.L.B., A.P.L.); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (M.H.B.); Lifespan Hospital System, Providence, RI (G.L.B.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI (A.P.L.).
Abstract:
Background Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) image interpretation might be more cognitively demanding than interpretation of digital mammography (DM) images. The time of day of interpretation might affect recall and false-positive (FP) rates, especially for DBT. Purpose To determine whether recall and FP rates vary by time of day of interpretation for screening mammography for breast cancer performed with DM and DBT. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study examining 97 671 screening mammograms interpreted by 18 radiologists between January 2018 and December 2019 at one of 12 community radiology sites. The association between the time of day of interpretation, the type of image interpreted (DM vs DBT), and radiologist experience (≤5 posttraining years vs >5 posttraining years) and the likelihood of a patient being recalled from screening mammography and the likelihood of whether the interpretation was FP or true positive were analyzed. Analyses were conducted using generalized linear mixed modeling with a binary distribution and sandwich estimation where observations were nested by radiologist. Results Screening mammograms interpreted by 18 radiologists were reviewed (40 220 DBTs, 57 451 DMs). Nine radiologists had 5 or fewer posttraining years of experience, and nine had more than 5 posttraining years of experience. The overall recall rates for DM (10.2%) and DBT (9.0%) were different (P = .006); FP rate also differed (9.8% DM, 8.6% DBT; P = .004). For radiologists with 5 or fewer posttraining years of experience, odds of recall increased 11.5% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.12, P = .01) with every hour when using DBT, but this was not found for DM (OR = 1.09, P = .06); DBT and DM were different (OR = 1.12 vs 1.09, P = .02). For radiologists with more than 5 posttraining years of experience, no evidence of increase in recall was observed for DBT (OR = 1.02, P = .27) or DM (OR = 1.0, P = .80), and there was no evidence that these were different (OR = 1.02 vs 1.0, P = .13). Conclusion Patients were more likely to be recalled when their screening digital breast tomosynthesis images were interpreted later in the day by less-experienced radiologists. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
More Related Videos
07:26The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
Published on: January 31, 2017
15:48Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography