Conventional surgery versus botulinum toxin injections for partially accommodative esotropia

Sara AlShammari1, Muneeb Alaam2, Shatha Alfreihi3

  • 1College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Canter, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Insights

Bilateral medial rectus recession (BMR) surgery demonstrated a higher success rate for treating partially accommodative esotropia (PAET) compared to botulinum toxin (BTX) injections. BMR also resulted in fewer complications and required shorter follow-up periods.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatric ophthalmology
  • Strabismus surgery

Background:

  • Partially accommodative esotropia (PAET) is a common form of strabismus in children.
  • Treatment options for PAET include surgical interventions like bilateral medial rectus recession (BMR) and non-surgical approaches.
  • Botulinum toxin (BTX) injection has emerged as an alternative treatment modality for various types of strabismus.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin (BTX) injection versus bilateral medial rectus recession (BMR) for the treatment of partially accommodative esotropia (PAET).
  • To evaluate surgical outcomes, complication rates, and follow-up durations for both treatment modalities in pediatric patients with PAET.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of medical records for children aged 1-14 years diagnosed with PAET between 2010 and 2020.
  • PAET defined as residual esotropia of at least 14 prism diopters after 6 weeks of full cycloplegic correction (> +2.5 D).
  • Success criteria: esotropia of 0-10 prism diopters after a single surgery or ≥1 BTX injections.

Main Results:

  • Bilateral medial rectus recession (BMR) achieved a higher success rate (70.9%) compared to botulinum toxin (BTX) injections (53.7%) (P = 0.006).
  • BMR was more effective in males, patients over 5 years old, and those with a spherical equivalent ≤ +5.00 D.
  • BTX group had a shorter mean surgery duration but longer follow-up, with a higher incidence of postoperative inferior oblique overaction and ptosis; BMR group had a higher rate of consecutive exotropia.

Conclusions:

  • Bilateral medial rectus recession (BMR) is a more successful surgical treatment for partially accommodative esotropia (PAET) than botulinum toxin (BTX) injections in the studied cohort.
  • Conventional BMR surgery offers advantages of shorter follow-up periods and a lower rate of complications compared to BTX injections for PAET management.
Abstract