Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Emergency department interventions that could be conducted in subacute care settings for patients with nonemergent
Ryan P Strum1, Walter Tavares2, Andrew Worster2
1Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Strum, Worster, Griffith, Costa), McMaster Institute for Research and Aging (Griffith), Emergency Medicine Division (Worster), Department of Medicine, and Department of Medicine (Costa), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; The Wilson Centre (Tavares), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; York Region Paramedic and Senior Services (Tavares), Regional Municipality of York, Newmarket, Ont. Strumr@mcmaster.ca.
Background:
As the number of patients with nonemergent conditions who are transported by paramedics continues to increase in Ontario, redirecting specific patients to subacute settings may be more beneficial and suitable for both patients and emergency departments. We aimed to evaluate whether emergency department interventions conducted on patients with nonemergent conditions who are transported by paramedics could be conducted in subacute health centres.
Methods:
We conducted a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study in Ontario between Oct. 13 and Dec. 19, 2020. We used purposive sampling to recruit practising emergency and primary care physicians for an expert panel. We abstracted interventions given to adult patients with nonemergent conditions (18 yr of age or older) who were transported by paramedics to an emergency department from the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) database (Jan. 1, 2014, to Mar. 31, 2018). Participants in the expert panel rated the suitability of the 150 most frequently recorded emergency department interventions from the NACRS database, for completion in subacute health care centres. We set consensus at 70% agreement.
Results:
We invited 25 physician experts, 21 of whom consented to participate; 20 physicians completed round 1, and 18 physicians completed both rounds. After 2 rounds, consensus was reached on 146 (97.3%) interventions; 103 interventions (68.7%) were suitable for subacute centres, 43 (28.7%) for only the emergency department and 4 (2.6%) did not receive consensus. For subacute centres, all 103 interventions were rated for urgent care centres; walk-in medical centres were applicable for 46 (30.6%) interventions and clinics led by nurse practitioners for 47 (31.3%) interventions.
Interpretation:
Most interventions provided to patients with nonemergent conditions transported by paramedics to emergency departments were identified as suitable for urgent care clinics, with one-third being suitable for either walk-in medical centres or clinics led by nurse practitioners. This study has potential to inform a patient classification model for paramedic-initiated redirection of patients from emergency departments, although further contextualization is required for this to be implemented in clinical practice.
Study Registration:
ID ISRCTN22901977.
More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
06:59A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
Published on: November 9, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management