Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

07:11
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
Published on: May 25, 2020
6.5K
Microperimetry, Humphrey field analyzer, and optical coherence tomography in detecting glaucoma: a comparative
Serpil Akar1, Oya Tekeli2, Zeynep Kayaarasi Ozturker3
1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Istanbul Hospital, Kisikli Cad. Oymaci Sok.No: 7, Uskudar, Istanbul, Turkey. akarserpil@yahoo.com.
International Ophthalmology
|January 13, 2022
Summary
Ganglion cell inner-plexiform layer thickness (GCIPLT) measurements showed the highest diagnostic performance for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). The Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24-2 test was superior to the 10-2 test, while microperimetry (MP) offered complementary insights.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Glaucoma diagnostics
- Visual electrophysiology
Background:
- Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness.
- Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective management and vision preservation.
- Current diagnostic methods include visual field testing and optical coherence tomography, but their comparative performance requires further evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic performance of microperimetry (MP), Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) visual field (VF) 10-2 and 24-2 tests, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in detecting POAG.
- To identify the most effective imaging or functional test for POAG diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 35 POAG eyes and 42 control eyes (age ≥50 years).
- VF testing using HFA and Macular Integrity Assessment.
- SD-OCT measurements of optic nerve head (ONH), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), and ganglion cell inner-plexiform layer thickness (GCIPLT).
- Analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and sensitivity at 95% specificity for each parameter.
Main Results:
- Minimum GCIPLT (ganglion cell inner-plexiform layer thickness) demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.952) among SD-OCT parameters.
- HFA 24-2 (AUC: 0.950) outperformed the HFA 10-2 test (p=0.036) in differentiating POAG from control eyes.
- GCIPLT measurements showed significantly better performance than HFA 10-2 (p=0.015).
- MP showed comparable performance to HFA 10-2, suggesting a complementary role.
Conclusions:
- GCIPLT measurements exhibit the highest diagnostic accuracy for detecting POAG.
- The HFA 24-2 visual field test is more effective than the HFA 10-2 test for distinguishing POAG.
- Microperimetry can serve as a valuable complementary tool in POAG diagnosis.

