Enhanced head-skull shape learning using statistical modeling and topological features
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
Published on: November 14, 2019
Tan-Nhu Nguyen1, Vi-Do Tran1, Ho-Quang Nguyen2
1Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Abstract:
Skull prediction from the head is a challenging issue toward a cost-effective therapeutic solution for facial disorders. This issue was initially studied in our previous work using full head-to-skull relationship learning. However, the head-skull thickness topology is locally shaped, especially in the face region. Thus, the objective of the present study was to enhance our head-to-skull prediction problem by using local topological features for training and predicting. Head and skull feature points were sampled on 329 head and skull models from computed tomography (CT) images. These feature points were classified into the back and facial topologies. Head-to-skull relations were trained using the partial least square regression (PLSR) models separately in the two topologies. A hyperparameter tuning process was also conducted for selecting optimal parameters for each training model. Thus, a new skull could be generated so that its shape was statistically fitted with the target head. Mean errors of the predicted skulls using the topology-based learning method were better than those using the non-topology-based learning method. After tenfold cross-validation, the mean error was enhanced 36.96% for the skull shapes and 14.17% for the skull models. Mean error in the facial skull region was especially improved with 4.98%. The mean errors were also improved 11.71% and 25.74% in the muscle attachment regions and the back skull regions respectively. Moreover, using the enhanced learning strategy, the errors (mean ± SD) for the best and worst prediction cases are from 1.1994 ± 1.1225 mm (median: 0.9036, coefficient of multiple determination (R2): 0.997274) to 3.6972 ± 2.4118 mm (median: 3.9089, R2: 0.999614) and from 2.0172 ± 2.0454 mm (median: 1.2999, R2: 0.995959) to 4.0227 ± 2.6098 mm (median: 3.9998, R2: 0.998577) for the predicted skull shapes and the predicted skull models respectively. This present study showed that more detailed information on the head-skull shape leads to a better accuracy level for the skull prediction from the head. In particular, local topological features on the back and face regions of interest should be considered toward a better learning strategy for the head-to-skull prediction problem. In perspective, this enhanced learning strategy was used to update our developed clinical decision support system for facial disorders. Furthermore, a new class of learning methods, called geometric deep learning will be studied.
Related Concept Videos
Overview of the Skull
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...
Sutures of the Skull
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...

