Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
Published on: March 13, 2021
Predicting the outputs of finite deep neural networks trained with noisy gradients
Gadi Naveh1,2, Oded Ben David3, Haim Sompolinsky1,2,4
1Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Abstract:
A recent line of works studied wide deep neural networks (DNNs) by approximating them as Gaussian processes (GPs). A DNN trained with gradient flow was shown to map to a GP governed by the neural tangent kernel (NTK), whereas earlier works showed that a DNN with an i.i.d. prior over its weights maps to the so-called neural network Gaussian process (NNGP). Here we consider a DNN training protocol, involving noise, weight decay, and finite width, whose outcome corresponds to a certain non-Gaussian stochastic process. An analytical framework is then introduced to analyze this non-Gaussian process, whose deviation from a GP is controlled by the finite width. Our contribution is threefold: (i) In the infinite width limit, we establish a correspondence between DNNs trained with noisy gradients and the NNGP, not the NTK. (ii) We provide a general analytical form for the finite width correction (FWC) for DNNs with arbitrary activation functions and depth and use it to predict the outputs of empirical finite networks with high accuracy. Analyzing the FWC behavior as a function of n, the training set size, we find that it is negligible for both the very small n regime, and, surprisingly, for the large n regime [where the GP error scales as O(1/n)]. (iii) We flesh out algebraically how these FWCs can improve the performance of finite convolutional neural networks (CNNs) relative to their GP counterparts on image classification tasks.
Related Concept Videos
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Hindsight Biases
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Improving Translational Accuracy