Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy01:25

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

234
The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:
234
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

207
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
207
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy01:26

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy

169
This lesson explores three gastrointestinal imaging techniques: radionuclide testing, colonic transit studies, and virtual colonoscopy.
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
169

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What Tools Do We Have to End the US HIV Epidemic? A Review of Structural, Biomedical and Implementation Interventions and Their Potential Population Impact.

Journal of the International AIDS Society·2026
Same author

Expansion trends and impacts of Phragmites australis on the Louisiana Gulf Coast.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2026
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer in Mexico City: A microsimulation modeling study.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same author

Reply.

Gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Effect of COVID-19 on Late HIV Diagnosis Rates by Race/Ethnicity in Ending the HIV Epidemic Priority Jurisdictions in the United States.

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)·2026
Same author

Can Colonoscopy Still Be Promoted as the Best Choice for Colorectal Cancer Screening?

Gastroenterology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

408

Reevaluating the Evidence for Intensive Postoperative Extracolonic Surveillance for Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Jonah Popp1, David S Weinberg2, Eva Enns3

  • 1Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
|January 15, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Recent trials may underestimate the benefits of intensive surveillance and metastasectomy for colorectal cancer. New analysis suggests these strategies offer meaningful survival gains, necessitating further research.

Keywords:
colorectal cancercomparative effectivenessextracolonic surveillancemetastasectomymicrosimulation modelpostoperative

More Related Videos

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

695
Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
08:12

Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Published on: March 14, 2019

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

408
Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

695
Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
08:12

Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Published on: March 14, 2019

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Previous trials (FACS, GILDA, COLOFOL) questioned the efficacy of intensive extracolonic surveillance and metastasectomy for resected nonmetastatic colorectal cancer.
  • An alternative explanation for trial outcomes is insufficient statistical power to detect clinically meaningful survival benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the value of intensive extracolonic surveillance and metastasectomy in colorectal cancer.
  • To assess if previous trials lacked the power to detect realistic survival benefits.

Main Methods:

  • A microsimulation model was developed to predict trial outcomes based on plausible efficacy of metastasectomy and surveillance.
  • The model estimated mortality reduction, statistical power, and life expectancy gains for different surveillance strategies.
  • Recurrence patterns in the FACS trial were analyzed for potential bias.

Main Results:

  • The model predicted ≤5% mortality reduction and <10% power for all three trials, suggesting underpowered studies.
  • Recurrence imbalance in the FACS trial likely biased survival results.
  • Intensive surveillance (CT scans, CEA assays) predicted a 2.6-3.6 month increase in life expectancy compared to less frequent or no surveillance.
  • A trial for metastasectomy should enroll 200-300 patients.

Conclusions:

  • Current trial results do not invalidate the potential benefits of metastasectomy or targeted extracolonic surveillance.
  • Clinically meaningful survival gains are possible, warranting further investigation.
  • A dedicated clinical trial for metastasectomy is recommended due to potential life-expectancy improvements and existing uncertainties.