Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.5K
A Fuzzy Collaborative Intelligence Approach to Group Decision-Making: a Case Study of Post-COVID-19 Restaurant
1Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Cognitive Computation
|January 17, 2022
Summary
This study introduces a novel fuzzy collaborative intelligence approach to achieve expert consensus in group decision-making. The method decomposes fuzzy judgment matrices to identify consensus, overcoming limitations of existing techniques for uncertain judgments.
Area of Science:
- Decision Sciences
- Artificial Intelligence
- Fuzzy Logic
Background:
- Existing group decision-making methods struggle with lack of consensus among experts.
- Forcing judgment modification or ignoring uncertainty can lead to unreasonable outcomes.
- Fuzzy group decision-making requires robust methods to handle expert disagreement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel fuzzy collaborative intelligence approach for achieving expert consensus.
- To address the limitations of existing methods in handling decision maker uncertainty.
- To develop a methodology that respects individual judgments even when uncertain.
Main Methods:
- Application of biologically inspired fuzzy logic to group tasks (fuzzy collaborative intelligence).
- Decomposition of individual fuzzy judgment matrices into submatrices.
- Identification of consensus from aggregated fuzzy judgment submatrices.
Main Results:
- The proposed fuzzy collaborative intelligence approach successfully identified consensus in a post-COVID-19 restaurant transformation case.
- Existing methods failed to identify consensus for the restaurant transformation due to employee uncertainty.
- The optimal transformation plan included physical distancing, protective screens, and improved air circulation.
Conclusions:
- A new fuzzy collaborative intelligence approach effectively identifies consensus in group decision-making.
- Decomposing fuzzy judgment matrices offers a viable alternative to traditional consensus-building methods.
- This methodology provides a more reasonable approach to decision-making under uncertainty.
Keywords:
DecompositionFuzzy collaborative intelligenceFuzzy group decision-makingPost-COVID-19 transformationRestaurantMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.3K
Groupthink
46.0K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
46.0K
Decision Making
294
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
294
Reason and Intuition
7.0K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.0K
Impact of Groups on Groups
30
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
30
Impact of Individuals on a Group
31
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
31

