Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Implementation of a Hyperbolic Vortex Plasma Reactor for the Removal of Micropollutants in Water
Published on: July 25, 2025
A review on removal of mercury from flue gas utilizing existing air pollutant control devices (APCDs)
Ying Li1, Jianglong Yu2, Yangxian Liu3
1School of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Featured Biochemical and Chemical Materials, Ningde Normal University, Ningde City, Fujian Province, China.
Abstract:
Mercury is a highly toxic heavy metal pollutant. It is of great significance to develop cost-effective mercury pollution control technologies of coal-fired flue gas. Among various mercury from flue gas removal methods, the application of existing air pollution control devices (APCDs) to remove mercury from flue gas is one of the most valuable methods because it doesn't need to install additional mercury removal equipment, reducing the cost of mercury removal. This review summarizes the recent progress of mercury from flue gas removal by APCDs (e.g., SCR denitration device, WFGD system and dust removal device). SCR denitration device can achieve partial removal of mercury in flue gas through combined with WFGD system, but easy inactivation and poor sulfur/water/heavy metals resistance of SCR catalyzers are still the main problems. WFGD systems can remove most of Hg2+ (80%-95%), but have low treatment ability for Hg0. Various oxidants can effectively oxidize Hg0 into Hg2+. However, traditional oxidants have high prices and secondary pollution due to the formation of by-products. Fabric filters (FFs), electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) and hybrid fabric filters (HFs) can all control the emission of mercury in the flue gas to a certain extent, especially can effectively remove most of HgP and part of Hg2+, but has low removal capacity for Hg0. Compared with ESP, FF has better capture efficiency for Hg2+ and Hg0, and a combination of ESP and FF, that is HF, can effectively improve the mercury removal capacity.
More Related Videos
12:05Preparation of Hydrophobic Metal-Organic Frameworks via Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition of Perfluoroalkanes for the Removal of Ammonia
Published on: October 10, 2013
08:17Coupling Carbon Capture from a Power Plant with Semi-automated Open Raceway Ponds for Microalgae Cultivation
Published on: August 14, 2020