Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Intracellular Phosphoflow Cytometry of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenotransplants
Published on: June 6, 2025
MECOM gene overexpression in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia
Mariam Elsherif1, Mahmoud Hammad1,2, Hanafy Hafez1,2
1Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt (CCHE), Cairo, Egypt.
Background:
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by blocked or aberrant differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells. The MECOM gene overexpression in hematopoietic progenitors induces myeloid differentiation block, resulting in increased self-renewal and survival of these transformed progenitors. However, its exact role in AML remains unclear. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of MECOM overexpression among pediatric AML patients, and assess its impact on clinical outcome.
Patients And Methods:
Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Livak method (2ΔΔCt) were used to determine relative MECOM expression level among 243 pediatric patients with AML. MECOM overexpression was considered if the cumulative relative expression was above 1 (2-ΔΔCt) and was designated as MECOM.
Results:
Of 243 AML patients tested 57(23.5%) demonstrated MECOM. Patients with MECOM had significantly lower median age. The frequency of MECOM was significantly higher among AML patients with 11q23 abnormalities, complex karyotypes and among high- and intermediate-risk groups compared to low-risk group (p = .014). MECOM patients had significantly lower overall survival (OS) (38.7 vs. 78.9%, p < .001), event-free survival (EFS) (37.3% vs. 68.4%, p < .001), and had higher cumulative incidence of relapse (49.5% vs. 23.5%, p = .002) at 36 months compared to MECOM patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that MECOM was an adverse prognostic factor for OS (hazards ratio (HR) = 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-3.60, p = .006) and EFS (HR= 1.71, 95% CI 1.07-2.75, p = .025). The logistic regression model showed that MECOM was an independent prognostic factor regardless of minimal residual disease status post first induction therapy in the intermediate-risk group (odds ratio 2.89; 95% CI 1.19-6.57, p = .018).
Conclusion:
The aberrant MECOM gene expression is an adverse prognostic factor, especially in patients without previously known cytogenetic risk factors. Our results suggest the potential benefit from pretreatment screening for MECOM gene overexpression in newly diagnosed AML patients for better risk stratification and treatment adjustment.
More Related Videos
10:21Proliferation and Differentiation of Murine Myeloid Precursor 32D/G-CSF-R Cells
Published on: February 21, 2018
09:01Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
Published on: March 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Somatic...
Differentiation of Common Myeloid Progenitor Cells
Master Transcription Regulators
Abnormal Proliferation