Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Whole-brain Segmentation and Change-point Analysis of Anatomical Brain MRI—Application in Premanifest Huntington's Disease
Published on: June 9, 2018
Semisupervised Training of a Brain MRI Tumor Detection Model Using Mined Annotations
Nathaniel C Swinburne1, Vivek Yadav1, Julie Kim1
1From the Departments of Radiology (N.C.S., V.Y., Y.R.C., D.C.G., J.T., V.H., S.S.H., S.K., J.L., K.J., A.I.H., R.J.Y.), Radiation Oncology (J.T.Y.), Neurosurgery (N.M.), Neurology (J.S.), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Division of Computational Oncology, (K.P., J.G., S.P.S.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (J.K.).
Abstract:
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for cancer imaging conceptually begin with automated tumor detection, which can provide the foundation for downstream AI tasks. However, supervised training requires many image annotations, and performing dedicated post hoc image labeling is burdensome and costly. Purpose To investigate whether clinically generated image annotations can be data mined from the picture archiving and communication system (PACS), automatically curated, and used for semisupervised training of a brain MRI tumor detection model. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, the cancer center PACS was mined for brain MRI scans acquired between January 2012 and December 2017 and included all annotated axial T1 postcontrast images. Line annotations were converted to boxes, excluding boxes shorter than 1 cm or longer than 7 cm. The resulting boxes were used for supervised training of object detection models using RetinaNet and Mask region-based convolutional neural network (R-CNN) architectures. The best-performing model trained from the mined data set was used to detect unannotated tumors on training images themselves (self-labeling), automatically correcting many of the missing labels. After self-labeling, new models were trained using this expanded data set. Models were scored for precision, recall, and F1 using a held-out test data set comprising 754 manually labeled images from 100 patients (403 intra-axial and 56 extra-axial enhancing tumors). Model F1 scores were compared using bootstrap resampling. Results The PACS query extracted 31 150 line annotations, yielding 11 880 boxes that met inclusion criteria. This mined data set was used to train models, yielding F1 scores of 0.886 for RetinaNet and 0.908 for Mask R-CNN. Self-labeling added 18 562 training boxes, improving model F1 scores to 0.935 (P < .001) and 0.954 (P < .001), respectively. Conclusion The application of semisupervised learning to mined image annotations significantly improved tumor detection performance, achieving an excellent F1 score of 0.954. This development pipeline can be extended for other imaging modalities, repurposing unused data silos to potentially enable automated tumor detection across radiologic modalities. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
More Related Videos
12:50Lesion Explorer: A Video-guided, Standardized Protocol for Accurate and Reliable MRI-derived Volumetrics in Alzheimer's Disease and Normal Elderly
Published on: April 14, 2014
06:44Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: June 7, 2020