Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Targeted Genotyping in Clinical Pharmacogenomics: What Is Missing?
Jaime L Lopes1, Kimberley Harris1, Mary Beth Karow1
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sequencing identifies more pharmacogenomic variants than targeted genotyping, revealing clinically relevant alleles in 28% of patients. This highlights the need for sequencing to detect rare variants impacting patient care.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacogenomics
- Genetics
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Clinical pharmacogenomic testing commonly uses targeted genotyping.
- Targeted genotyping panels may miss clinically relevant variants.
- Sequencing offers comprehensive detection of common and rare variants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic yield of in silico targeted genotyping with comprehensive sequencing.
- To evaluate the patient impact of variants missed by targeted genotyping.
- To assess the utility of sequencing for pharmacogenomic variant detection.
Main Methods:
- An in silico targeted genotyping panel was designed based on common clinical variants.
- The panel was applied to 10,030 participants with existing sequencing data.
- Results were compared between in silico genotyping and reported sequencing findings for genes including CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, DPYD, SLCO1B1, TPMT, UGT1A1, and VKORC1.
Main Results:
- Sequencing identified potentially clinically relevant variants in 28% (2780/10,030) of participants missed by targeted genotyping.
- SLCO1B1 (13%), DPYD (6.3%), and CYP2D6 (3.5%) had the highest proportion of variants uniquely detected by sequencing.
- DPYD and CYP2D6 exhibited the largest number of unique variants exclusively identified through sequencing.
Conclusions:
- Targeted genotyping captures most significant pharmacogenomic variants but misses rare alleles.
- Sequencing-based approaches are crucial for comprehensive pharmacogenomic profiling, detecting variants that collectively impact many patients.
- Standardization of variant classification and nomenclature is needed for widespread adoption of sequencing in pharmacogenomics.
More Related Videos
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
09:34Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Modern Molecular Taxonomy