Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Transurethral Instillation Procedure in Adult Male Mouse
Published on: November 2, 2017
A randomised trial comparing transurethral to percutaneous cystolithotripsy in boys
Ahmed A Shahat1, Ahmed A Kamel1, Taha M Taha1
1Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt.
Insights
Percutaneous cystolithotripsy (PCCL) and transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) are effective for pediatric bladder stones. PCCL offers a shorter operative time and reduced need for stone fragmentation compared to TUCL.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Urolithiasis Management
Background:
- Bladder stones in children require effective management.
- Transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) and percutaneous cystolithotripsy (PCCL) are surgical options.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and morbidity of TUCL versus PCCL for bladder stones in male children.
- To evaluate operative time, success rates, and complications.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 100 boys under 14 years with bladder or urethral stones (<30 mm).
- Patients were randomized into TUCL (Group A) or PCCL (Group B) groups.
- Outcomes assessed included preoperative criteria, intraoperative details, and postoperative results.
Main Results:
- Both TUCL and PCCL demonstrated high success rates (96% and 98%, respectively).
- PCCL showed a significantly shorter operative time (median 13 min vs. 21.5 min for TUCL).
- Fewer stones required disintegration with PCCL (44% vs. 94% for TUCL).
Conclusions:
- TUCL and PCCL have comparable success and complication rates for pediatric bladder stones.
- PCCL is associated with a reduced operative time and less need for stone fragmentation.
- PCCL may be a more efficient approach in select pediatric cases.
Objective:
To compare the efficacy and morbidity of transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) and percutaneous CL (PCCL) in the management of bladder stones in male children.
Patients And Methods:
A total of 100 boys, aged <14 years with a single bladder or urethral stone of <30 mm, were randomised into two equal groups. Initial diagnostic urethro-cystoscopy and push back of urethral stones were done for patients in both groups. Patients in Group A had TUCL, while those in Group B had PCCL through a 20-F sheath using a 12-F nephroscope. The two groups were compared regarding preoperative criteria, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes.
Results:
The patients in this study had a median (range) age of 36 (4-144) months and stone size of 10 (5-26) mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for preoperative criteria. The assigned procedure was successful in 48 (96%) patients in Group A and 49 (98%) in Group B (P = 1). Complications were encountered in 11 (22%) patients in Group A and five (10%) in Group B (P = 0.171). The median (range) operative time was 21.5 (4-90) min in Group A and 13 (5-70) min in Group B (P < 0.001). In all, 47 (94%) stones needed disintegration in Group A vs 22 (44%) in Group B (P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Both techniques have comparable success and complications rates. However, PCCL has a shorter operative time and less need for stone disintegration.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Urinary Tract Calculi I: Introduction

