Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deep learning-based automatic field of view planning for prostate MRI in oblique coronal and oblique axial planes.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Automatic field-of-view planning for magnetic resonance shoulder imaging using Deep Learning.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences·2026
Same author

Ultra-low dose protocol on photon-counting computed tomography as an alternative to radiographic shunt series in the diagnosis of mechanical ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications - an ex vivo phantom study for children and adults.

Neuroradiology·2026
Same author

Revealing the radiation dose impact of topogram, and contrast material monitoring scans in paediatric chest CT scans: comparison to adults and establishment of local DRLs.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same author

Retractions of publications in radiomics: An underestimated problem?

European radiology·2025
Same author

Correction: Növer et al. Prediction of Recurrence and Rupture Risk of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms of the Posterior Circulation: A Machine Learning-Based Analysis. <i>Diagnostics</i> 2025, <i>15</i>, 2365.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same journal

Vessel Wall Imaging in 1.5 T MRI Using Deep Learning Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Interchangeability With Standard 3 T MRI.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Accelerated Deep-Learning-Based Image Reconstruction for 3D T2 Dark-Fluid in Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

3D Freehand Ultrasound Imaging of Optic Nerve Sheath.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Iodinated Contrast Media Hypersensitivity in 115,966 Patients: Risk Factors, Severity Profiles, and the Impact of Iodine Concentration on Reaction Risk.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Improvement of Lung Nodule Volumetric Accuracy with Photon-counting Computed Tomography Over Energy-integrating Computed Tomography in Low-dose Screening: A Phantom Study.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Photon-counting CT in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Improved Metal Artifact Reduction and Impact on Bone Fusion Assessment.

Investigative radiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K

Benchmarking Feature Selection Methods in Radiomics.

Aydin Demircioğlu1

  • 1From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Investigative Radiology
|January 19, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Feature selection methods in radiomic studies vary in performance. Simpler methods are often more stable and achieve comparable predictive accuracy to complex ones, with specific algorithms recommended for radiomic applications.

More Related Videos

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
10:17

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics

Published on: January 8, 2018

13.3K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K
Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
10:17

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics

Published on: January 8, 2018

13.3K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Radiomics
  • Medical Imaging Analysis
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

Background:

  • High-dimensional data in radiomics arises from small sample sizes and numerous extracted features.
  • Feature selection is crucial for removing redundant and irrelevant features in radiomic datasets.
  • Understanding the performance of various feature selection algorithms is key for effective radiomic studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of 29 feature selection algorithms in radiomic studies.
  • To compare algorithms based on training times, feature stability, and ranking similarity.
  • To assess the predictive performance of feature selection methods using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated 29 feature selection algorithms and 10 classifiers on 10 public radiomic datasets.
  • Compared methods for training time, feature selection stability, and pairwise similarity (ranking).
  • Measured predictive performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the best classifier.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences observed in training times, stability, and similarity across feature selection methods.
  • No single feature selection method consistently outperformed others in predictive performance.
  • Simpler feature selection methods demonstrated greater stability without compromising predictive accuracy (AUC).

Conclusions:

  • Simpler feature selection methods are more stable and perform comparably to complex methods in radiomics.
  • Analysis of variance (ANOVA), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and minimum redundancy, maximum relevance (mRMR) ensemble are recommended.
  • These recommended methods showed superior predictive performance compared to most other evaluated feature selection techniques.