Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras
Published on: May 31, 2014
Evolution of the bovid cranium: morphological diversification under allometric constraint.
Faysal Bibi1, Joshua Tyler2,3
1Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution & Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstr. 43, Berlin, 10115, Germany. faysal.bibi@mfn.berlin.
Bovid cranial morphology shows surprising uniformity despite diverse diets and habitats, suggesting evolutionary constraints rather than direct environmental adaptation. Size and diet interact to influence cranial shape, but modularity plays no significant role.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Comparative Anatomy
- Paleontology
Background:
- Environmental selection is often assumed to drive novel morphology, particularly in bovids (antelopes and relatives) with diverse dietary and climatic preferences.
- Cranial morphology in bovids is presumed to be an adaptation to varying environmental pressures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of extrinsic (diet, habitat) and intrinsic (size, modularity) factors on bovid cranial shape.
- To test the hypothesis that bovid cranial morphology is primarily shaped by adaptive evolution in response to environmental pressures.
Main Methods:
- 3D geometric morphometric analyses were conducted on 141 crania from 96 bovid species.
- Statistical analyses assessed the impact of diet, habitat, net primary productivity, size, and modularity on cranial shape variation.
Main Results:
- Bovid cranial morphospace is highly clumped, with many ecologically diverse species exhibiting similar morphologies.
- Differences in cranial shape across dietary and habitat categories were largely non-significant.
- A significant interaction was found between body size and diet in explaining cranial shape variation.
- No evidence supported a role for modularity in generating cranial differences within the bovid lineage.
Conclusions:
- Bovid cranial morphology is largely constrained by conserved size-shape allometry, not direct environmental selection for novel shapes.
- Dietary diversification appears to have evolved through adaptation within existing allometric pathways, rather than driving fundamental morphological changes.
Related Concept Videos
Sutures of the Skull
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
Cranial Bones: Lateral View
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
Overview of the Skull
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
Convergent Evolution
Speciation Rates

