Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2025
Binding mode of brazzein to the taste receptor based on crystal structure and docking simulation
Tae-Yeon Kim1, Eui-Jeon Woo1, Tae-Sung Yoon1
1Disease Target Structure Research Center, Korea Research Institute Bioscience & Biotechnology, 125, Gwahak-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea; Proteomic Structure Biology, Korea University Science & Technology, 217, Gajeong-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Several natural substances including protein produce sweet taste. Brazzein, derived from the plant Pentadipladra brazzeana, is one of the sweet proteins that bind to the taste receptor with stronger sweetness than sugar. Mutations of this protein affect its flavour, yielding higher sweetness in D29K and lower sweetness in R43A. To elucidate its sweet mechanism in the taste receptor, we determined the structures of two variants, D29K and R43A, to a resolution of 1.5 Å and 1.3 Å, respectively. Structures of the brazzein exhibit two α-helix and three β-sheets connected by four disulfide bonds with a significantly altered electrostatic distribution on the surface. Using the high-resolution structure data and models of the taste receptors T1R2 and T1R3 in the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database, we performed a docking calculation on the receptors and report that brazzein is bound between the two cysteine rich domains (CRDs) of the heterodimer protein complex. Substitution to lysine in D29K resulted in an increased number of hydrogen bonds in the T1R2 receptor, while substitution to alanine in R43A ablated a polar interaction in the T1R3 receptor. The significantly altered interaction of the variants at the interface is consistent with a change of the sweetness. The high-resolution structure and the docking model in this study may provide a structural basis to understand the flavour mechanism induced by the sweet protein.
More Related Videos
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
05:08Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Protein-Drug Binding: Mechanism and Kinetics
Various forces drive these interactions, including hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, ionic bonds, electrostatic interactions, and van der Waals forces. These bonds enable drugs to bind to specific sites on proteins,...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Drug-Receptor Bonds
In...
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
Drug Binding to Blood Components
HSA is the most abundant plasma protein and is vital in drug binding. It contains distinct drug-binding sites, with different drugs exhibiting affinity for specific sites. There are three main drug-binding domains for HSA: sites I, II, and III. These domains are...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength