Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Network Function of a Circuit01:25

Network Function of a Circuit

421
Frequency response analysis in electrical circuits provides vital insights into a circuit's behavior as the frequency of the input signal changes. The transfer function, a mathematical tool, is instrumental in understanding this behavior. It defines the relationship between phasor output and input and comes in four types: voltage gain, current gain, transfer impedance, and transfer admittance. The critical components of the transfer function are the poles and zeros.
421
Comparison between RL and RC circuits01:24

Comparison between RL and RC circuits

4.5K
An RC circuit consists of resistance and capacitance, while in an RL circuit, capacitance is replaced by an inductor. RL and RC circuits are first-order differential circuits that store energy. An RC circuit stores energy in the electric field, while an RL circuit stores energy in the magnetic field. When connected to a battery, an RC circuit charges the capacitor, causing the current to decrease from maximum to zero upon being fully charged. This increases the voltage across the capacitor from...
4.5K
Network Covalent Solids02:18

Network Covalent Solids

14.9K
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
14.9K
Norton's Theorem01:14

Norton's Theorem

864
Norton's theorem is a fundamental principle stating that a linear two-terminal circuit can be substituted with an equivalent circuit, which comprises a current source (ⅠN) in parallel with a resistor (RN). Here, ⅠN represents the short-circuit current flowing through the terminals, and RN stands for the input or equivalent resistance at the terminals when all independent sources are deactivated. This implies that the circuit illustrated in Figure (a) can be exchanged with the...
864
Norton Equivalent Circuits01:16

Norton Equivalent Circuits

519
Norton's theorem is a fundamental concept in the field of electrical engineering that allows for the simplification of complex AC circuits. The theorem states that any two-terminal linear network can be replaced with an equivalent circuit that consists of an impedance, which is parallel with a constant current source. Figure 1 shows the AC circuit portioned into two parts: Circuit A and Circuit B, while Figure 2 depicts the circuit obtained by replacing Circuit A by its Norton equivalent...
519
Circuit Terminology01:14

Circuit Terminology

2.3K
An electrical network is a system composed of interconnected elements, such as resistors, capacitors, inductors, and voltage or current sources. Unlike a circuit, an electrical network does not necessarily form a closed path. In other words, while all circuits can be considered networks due to their interconnected nature, not every network qualifies as a circuit.
A circuit, on the other hand, is also an interconnected system of electrical elements but must contain one or more closed paths.
2.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Finite-Length Analyses for Source and Channel Coding on Markov Chains.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

Reduction Theorem for Secrecy over Linear Network Code for Active Attacks.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same journal

Research on a Regional Availability Evaluation Model for Road-Area High-Entropy Energy Based on Synergy Factors.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Atmospheric Turbulence Channel Modeling and Performance Analysis of a CO-ZP-OFDM Coherent Optical Communication System for UAV Air-to-Ground Scenarios.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Information Geometry and Asymptotic Theory for SMML Estimators.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Correlation Entropy and Power-Law Kinetics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Research on the Contagion of Systemic Financial Risk Under the Impact of Climate Risks-From the Perspective of Complex Networks and Machine Learning.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Statistical-Mechanical Meaning of the Wave Function of Quantum Mechanics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit
05:30

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit

Published on: September 8, 2023

718

Secure Physical Layer Network Coding versus Secure Network Coding.

Masahito Hayashi1,2,3,4

  • 1Shenzhen Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518055, China.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Secure physical layer network coding (secure PLNC) offers a cross-layer solution for secure data transmission over noisy networks. This study compares secure PLNC against traditional secure network coding combined with error correction methods.

Keywords:
cross-layer protocolnetwork codingphysical layer securitysecrecy analysissecure communicationuntrusted relay

More Related Videos

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.5K
Quasi-light Storage for Optical Data Packets
07:45

Quasi-light Storage for Optical Data Packets

Published on: February 6, 2014

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit
05:30

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit

Published on: September 8, 2023

718
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.5K
Quasi-light Storage for Optical Data Packets
07:45

Quasi-light Storage for Optical Data Packets

Published on: February 6, 2014

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Information Theory
  • Network Security
  • Coding Theory

Background:

  • Untrusted relay nodes in networks pose information leakage risks.
  • Secure network coding (secure NC) ensures message secrecy over noiseless networks against eavesdropping.
  • Noisy channels require error correction before applying secure NC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of secure physical layer network coding (secure PLNC) with a combination of secure NC and error correction.
  • To evaluate these methods over typical network models used in secure NC research.

Main Methods:

  • Secure PLNC as a cross-layer protocol combining coding operations at nodes for noisy channels.
  • Secure NC as an upper-layer protocol for noiseless networks.
  • Comparative analysis of secure PLNC and secure NC with error correction.

Main Results:

  • Secure PLNC integrates error correction and security at the physical layer for noisy networks.
  • Secure NC with error correction applies these separately, potentially less efficiently.
  • Performance variations are observed across different network models.

Conclusions:

  • Secure PLNC presents a viable cross-layer approach for enhanced network security over noisy channels.
  • The choice between secure PLNC and combined secure NC/error correction depends on network specifics.
  • Further research can optimize secure PLNC for diverse network topologies.