Structure-conditioned amino-acid couplings: How contact geometry affects pairwise sequence preferences
Jack Holland1, Gevorg Grigoryan1
1Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Abstract:
Relating a protein's sequence to its conformation is a central challenge for both structure prediction and sequence design. Statistical contact potentials, as well as their more descriptive versions that account for side-chain orientation and other geometric descriptors, have served as simplistic but useful means of representing second-order contributions in sequence-structure relationships. Here we ask what happens when a pairwise potential is conditioned on the fully defined geometry of interacting backbones fragments. We show that the resulting structure-conditioned coupling energies more accurately reflect pair preferences as a function of structural contexts. These structure-conditioned energies more reliably encode native sequence information and more highly correlate with experimentally determined coupling energies. Clustering a database of interaction motifs by structure results in ensembles of similar energies and clustering them by energy results in ensembles of similar structures. By comparing many pairs of interaction motifs and showing that structural similarity and energetic similarity go hand-in-hand, we provide a tangible link between modular sequence and structure elements. This link is applicable to structural modeling, and we show that scoring CASP models with structured-conditioned energies results in substantially higher correlation with structural quality than scoring the same models with a contact potential. We conclude that structure-conditioned coupling energies are a good way to model the impact of interaction geometry on second-order sequence preferences.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...


