Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling01:27

¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling

2.0K
The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
2.0K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

14.0K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
14.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.2K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.2K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

5.0K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
5.0K
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

58.3K
Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
58.3K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.5K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combining computational modeling and experimental library screening to affinity-mature VEEV-neutralizing antibody F5.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2025
Same author

A comparison of antibody-antigen complex sequence-to-structure prediction methods and their systematic biases.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2024
Same author

A Comparison of Antibody-Antigen Complex Sequence-to-Structure Prediction Methods and their Systematic Biases.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Author Correction: Vaccination induces broadly neutralizing antibody precursors to HIV gp41.

Nature immunology·2024
Same author

Vaccination induces broadly neutralizing antibody precursors to HIV gp41.

Nature immunology·2024
Same author

A significance score for protein-protein interaction models through random docking.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
07:08

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

7.4K

Structure-conditioned amino-acid couplings: How contact geometry affects pairwise sequence preferences.

Jack Holland1, Gevorg Grigoryan1

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.

Protein Science : a Publication of the Protein Society
|January 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Structure-conditioned coupling energies improve protein sequence-structure relationship predictions. These energies more accurately reflect native sequence information and enhance protein structure modeling accuracy.

Keywords:
contact potentialcoupling energysequence-structure relationshipsstatistical energystructural modelingtertiary motifs

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.0K
Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR
14:44

Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR

Published on: December 16, 2013

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
07:08

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

7.4K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.0K
Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR
14:44

Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR

Published on: December 16, 2013

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Protein structure prediction
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Relating protein sequence to 3D conformation is crucial for structure prediction and sequence design.
  • Statistical contact potentials offer simplified representations of sequence-structure relationships.
  • Existing potentials often lack detailed geometric context.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of backbone geometry on pairwise potentials in proteins.
  • To develop and evaluate structure-conditioned coupling energies.
  • To assess their utility in modeling sequence-structure relationships and protein design.

Main Methods:

  • Developing pairwise potentials conditioned on defined backbone fragment geometry.
  • Calculating structure-conditioned coupling energies.
  • Correlating energies with native sequence information and experimental data.
  • Clustering interaction motifs by structure and energy.
  • Scoring protein models (CASP) using these energies.

Main Results:

  • Structure-conditioned coupling energies more accurately reflect pair preferences within specific structural contexts.
  • These energies better encode native sequence information and correlate with experimental coupling energies.
  • Structural and energetic similarity of interaction motifs are strongly linked.
  • Scoring CASP models with structure-conditioned energies shows higher correlation with structural quality compared to contact potentials.

Conclusions:

  • Structure-conditioned coupling energies provide a more accurate model for sequence-structure relationships.
  • They effectively capture the influence of interaction geometry on sequence preferences.
  • This approach offers tangible links between modular sequence and structure elements for protein modeling and design.