Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: Computing the Effects of a Local Radiofrequency Hyperthermia Intervention on Tumor Biomechanics
Published on: December 1, 2023
A dynamic blood flow model to compute absorbed dose to circulating blood and lymphocytes in liver external beam
Shu Xing1, Jungwook Shin1,2, Jennifer Pursley1
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Abstract:
We have developed a novel 4D dynamic liver blood flow model, capable of accurate dose estimation to circulating blood cells during liver-directed external beam radiotherapy, accounting for blood recirculation and radiation delivery time structure. Adult male and adult female liver computational phantoms with detailed vascular trees were developed to include the hepatic arterial, hepatic portal venous, and hepatic venous trees. A discrete time Markov Chain approach was applied to determine the spatiotemporal distribution of 105blood particles (BP) in the human body based on reference values for cardiac output and organ blood volumes. For BPs entering the liver, an explicit Monte Carlo simulation was implemented to track their propagation along ∼2000 distinct vascular pathways through the liver. The model tracks accumulated absorbed dose from time-dependent radiation fields with a 0.1 s time resolution. The computational model was then evaluated for 3 male and 3 female patients receiving photon (VMAT and IMRT) and proton (passive SOBP and active PBS) treatments. The dosimetric impact of treatment modality, delivery time, and fractionation on circulating blood cells was investigated and quantified using the mean dose (μdose,b),V,VandD2%. Average reductions inμdose,b,V,VandD2%of 45%, 6%, 53%, 19% respectively, were observed for proton treatments as compared to photon treatments. Our simulation also showed thatV,V, andD2%were highly sensitive to the beam-on time. BothVandVincreased with beam-on time, whereasD2%decreased with increasing beam-on time, demonstrating the tradeoff between low dose to a large fraction of blood cells and high dose to a small fraction of blood cells. Consequently, proton treatments are not necessarily advantageous in terms of dose to the blood simply based on integral dose considerations. Instead, both integral dose and beam-on time can substantially impact relevant dosimetric indices.
More Related Videos
08:54Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021