Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Selection

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...

Limits to Natural Selection

Limits to Natural Selection

Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Musculo-skeletal variation in the forelimb of two highly specialised diggers (genus Talpa).

Journal of anatomy·2026

Same author

From head to tail: does habitat use drive morphological variation in snakes?

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026

Same author

Thermal and immunological stress modulate the locomotor performance of female <i>Xenopus laevis</i> frogs.

Conservation physiology·2026

Same author

Endocranial morphology in worm lizards (Amphisbaenia, Squamata): multiple neuroanatomical solutions to a fossorial lifestyle.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same author

Anatomical description of the jaw muscles and theoretical bite force assessment in South American opossums using manual and digital dissection methods.

Journal of anatomy·2026

Same author

The Impact of Substrate Properties on the Kinematics of Locomotion in a Limb-Reduced Skink, Ablepharus kitaibelii (Squamata: Scincidae).

Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

Machine learning accurately predicts the multivariate performance phenotype from morphology in lizards.

Simon P Lailvaux¹, Avdesh Mishra², Pooja Pun³

¹Department of Biological Sciences, The University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, United States of America.

|January 21, 2022

Summary

Machine learning accurately predicts lizard performance traits from morphology alone, even with extensive missing data. This method aids understanding of performance evolution and phenomics without needing phylogenetic information.

More Related Videos

Testing Visual Sensitivity to the Speed and Direction of Motion in Lizards

Testing Visual Sensitivity to the Speed and Direction of Motion in Lizards

Published on: December 14, 2006

Computer-Generated Animal Model Stimuli

Computer-Generated Animal Model Stimuli

Published on: July 29, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

Testing Visual Sensitivity to the Speed and Direction of Motion in Lizards

Testing Visual Sensitivity to the Speed and Direction of Motion in Lizards

Published on: December 14, 2006

Computer-Generated Animal Model Stimuli

Computer-Generated Animal Model Stimuli

Published on: July 29, 2007

Area of Science:

Evolutionary biology
Quantitative genetics
Computational biology

Background:

Completing the genotype-to-phenotype map requires comprehensive organismal phenotype measurement.
Large-scale phenotyping is challenging, leading to missing data that hinders comparative analyses and evolutionary trend assessments.
Predicting multivariate performance traits from morphology is particularly difficult due to logistical constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a machine learning model for accurately estimating multivariate performance data solely from morphological measurements.
To address the challenge of missing performance data in large-scale phenotyping studies.
To improve the prediction of performance traits crucial for understanding evolutionary trends.

Main Methods:

A machine learning model was developed and trained on a dataset of performance and morphology data from 68 lizard species.
A stacked model architecture was utilized for enhanced predictive accuracy.
The model was evaluated on its ability to predict missing performance data from simple morphological measures.

Main Results:

The developed machine learning model accurately estimates multivariate performance data from morphology alone at the individual level.
The model performed exceptionally well, even for traits with over 90% missing values.
Incorporating phylogenetic information did not improve the model's predictive fit, indicating phenotypic data alone was sufficient.

Conclusions:

This machine learning approach effectively predicts performance phenotypes from morphology, overcoming challenges of missing data.
The method enhances our understanding of performance evolution and can integrate performance data into future phenomics research.
Phylogenetic information is not essential for accurate performance prediction when sufficient morphological data is available.