Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

An Objective and Child-friendly Assessment of Arm Function by Using a 3-D Sensor
Published on: February 12, 2018
Biomechanical analysis of force distribution in one-handed and two-handed child chest compression- a randomized
Jui-Yi Tsou1, Chia-Lung Kao2, Yi-Fang Tu3
1Department of Physical Therapy, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Insights
Two-handed (TH) external chest compressions (ECC) in children provide more even force distribution and greater compression force compared to one-hand (OH) ECC. TH ECC also results in less rescuer fatigue and pain.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Pediatric Resuscitation
Background:
- Effective external chest compression (ECC) relies on even force distribution.
- Limited research compares force distribution between one-hand (OH) and two-handed (TH) ECC in children.
- Investigating these techniques is crucial for optimizing pediatric resuscitation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare force distribution during OH and TH ECC in children.
- To assess rescuer-perceived fatigue and discomfort/pain between OH and TH ECC techniques.
- To determine the optimal ECC method for pediatric resuscitation.
Main Methods:
- A crossover manikin study involving 35 registered nurses.
- Participants performed lone rescuer ECC using both TH and OH techniques for 2 minutes each at a rate of at least 100 compressions/min.
- A Resusci Junior Basic manikin with a MatScan pressure system measured force; modified Borg scale and NRS assessed fatigue and pain.
Main Results:
- TH ECC generated significantly greater maximum compression force (56.58 ± 13.67 kg) than OH ECC (45.12 ± 7.90 kg).
- TH ECC demonstrated a more even force distribution, indicated by a smaller maximum-minimum force difference (52.24 ± 13.43 kg vs. 41.36 ± 7.57 kg).
- Rescuers reported significantly less perceived exertion and pain with TH ECC compared to OH ECC.
Conclusions:
- Two-handed ECC in children results in more effective compression with better force distribution.
- The TH method is superior to the OH method in reducing rescuer fatigue and physical pain.
- These findings support the use of TH ECC for improved outcomes in pediatric resuscitation.
Background:
Even force distribution would generate efficient external chest compression (ECC). Little research has been done to compare force distribution between one-hand (OH) and two-handed (TH) during child ECC. Therefore, this study was to investigate force distribution, rescuer perceived fatigue and discomfort/pain when applying OH and TH ECC in children.
Methods:
Crossover manikin study. Thirty-five emergency department registered nurses performed lone rescuer ECC using TH and OH techniques, each for 2 min at a rate of at least 100 compressions/min. A Resusci Junior Basic manikin equipped with a MatScan pressure measurement system was used to collect data. The perceived exertion scale (modified Borg scale) and numerical rating scale (NRS) was applied to evaluate the fatigue and physical pain of delivering chest compressions.
Results:
The maximum compression force (kg) delivered was 56.58 ± 13.67 for TH and 45.12 ± 7.90 for OH ECC (p < 0.001). The maximum-minimum force difference force delivered by TH and OH ECC was 52.24 ± 13.43 and 41.36 ± 7.57, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean caudal force delivered by TH and OH ECC was 29.45 ± 16.70 and 34.03 ± 12.01, respectively (p = 0.198). The mean cranial force delivered by TH and OH ECC was 27.13 ± 11.30 and 11.09 ± 9.72, respectively (p < 0.001). The caudal-cranial pressure difference delivered by TH and OH ECC was 19.14 ± 15.96 and 26.94 ± 14.48, respectively (p = 0.016). The perceived exertion and NRS for OH ECC was higher than that of the TH method (p < 0.001, p = 0.004, respectively).
Conclusions:
The TH method produced greater compression force, had more efficient compression, and delivered a more even force distribution, and produced less fatigue and physical pain in the rescuer than the OH method.
Trial Registration:
The Cheng Kung University Institutional Review Board A-ER-103-387. http://nckuhirb.med.ncku.edu.tw/sitemap.php.
Related Concept Videos
Pressure Relationships in Thoracic Cavity
Breathing Mechanisms
Both intra-alveolar and intrapleural pressures rely on specific lung properties. The ability to breathe—allowing air to enter the lungs...
Two Force Member

